0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
I replied to their email with this....But a boxcar that looks like something I bought at Kiddie City back in 1983? You're on the wrong track....I don't know if it'll make any difference, but at least it didn't bounce back.
I think I bought my last Bachmann freight car at Toys-R-Us in the late 1970s- and never had very many. Almost bought a flat car a few years ago, then realized the stake pockets were sized for 10x10 posts.
I replied to their email with this.I don't know if it'll make any difference, but at least it didn't bounce back.
Looks like the Bachmann roof grafted onto the MTL body would yield the basis for an accurate ATSF model, provided both models are in scale to the prototype.
Thank you Ed for letting Bachmann know what many of us were thinking. I guess it would make more impact if we all contacted Bachmann with our sentiment, but I suspect that it wouldn't make a difference.
Don't know why the picture didn't show up on my last post, here's the link:https://www.cnwhs.org/imggallery/displayimage.php?pid=1973&fullsize=1
The Northeastern caboose, USRA twin hopper, and the two 8k gallon tank cars are top notch. The outside post trailer on the TOFC is decent also even though the flatcar is horrible. So they do make some rolling stock gems here and there, but definitely its not a given. And they always get dumped to market at some point, which is the best time to pick up the decent models. They must be making money in the overseas markets because they continue to follow this business method.
Thanks for the mini-review. I'll take a look at the tank cars (which I assume are the ones Bachmann lists as 10k and 3-dome on their website?) if I find them on sale somewhere in road names I can use. On hoppers, Bluford keeps bringing out styles (including USRA) and roadnames on my wishlist, so I am pretty committed to those (not to mention very happy with the level of detail on the Bluford models).
So much for you not being that guy anymore.