0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
One thing that continues to amuse me about Amtrak equipment. It seems that they are making no real attempt to match up profiles. I mean, they have a tradition of that (ie, F40s and Amfleets), but it surprises me that they didn't give it all a bit more effort.I mean, even the power packs and the cars on the new Avelias don't match!See the "bump" on the side of the first car as compared with the locomotive.
Now that locomotive is fugly! Some sort of angry-bird and a fish-like looking tihing. I don't think it will ever grow on me. And the mismatch just makes things worse. I'll take the Charger over that any day.
I think it looks like a snake head.
I mean, even the power packs and the cars on the new Avelias don't match!See the "bump" on the side of the first car as compared with the locomotive.
Saw the pre-order price online for the Charger at $269. Not near the MSRP of $429 but still kinda painful. For that price, I hope Bachmann can add some of the lighting features of their HO one.
Looks like a beluga whale to me.Also, I don't think Amtrak cares, nor should they, about how it looks. Leave that to the modelers. They should be more interested in matters like total life cycle cost, performance and operational availability.
I respectfully disagree. While those three items are important to the bottom line and critical to long-term success, the Voice Of The Customer is also critical to the bottom line and long-term success. If a customer's first impression of the train is "Ewww", then it will be difficult for them to have an overall positive experience, which is something Amtrak desperately needs. Surely the design engineers could have come up with something much more attractive and still met life cycle cost, performance and reliability goals...YMMV