0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
This has been a very informative and interesting thread to read. I have a question regarding metal wheels. It seems like the Fox Valley wheels are highly favored by most. There are now a handful of choices when it comes to metal wheels in N scale, and at least when I look at pictures of them online, they all seem to have similar characteristics. Is there a reason the Fox Valley wheels are favored over some of these others? Or is it just a function that some of them haven't been around long enough to make a fair comparison? I'm thinking of the wheels offered by Rapido, ESM, InterMountain....Thanks,Brian.
IIRC, FVM metal wheels were the first wheels sold specifically as replacement wheels for pretty much all the various N scale models. They were available in several axle lengths, and had the most realistic (semi-scale) appearance from all the N scale wheels. So they were quickly adopted. Then they even came out with wider tread wheels - so even more choices for the modelers.Later on, several new players have sprung up in the replacement wheels area (BLMA, Intermountain, ESM, and others), and those sell well too, but they don't have the variety of axle lengths that FVM had. However FVM has not been regularly producing their wheels. A lot of us are waiting and hoping that FVM will start producing their wide range of wheels again.
John, that video looks (and sounds) great!What is the consensus on implementing drag springs? A MT coupler spring sliced in half? I recall a somewhat recent discussion about this but I couldn't find anything after a quick search.Lucas
Don,t forget also that FVM sold their wheels in 100 packs !
He's the one that suggests a half of an MT coupler spring, and not the other axle spring that MT makes.
IIRC, FVM metal wheels were the first wheels sold specifically as replacement wheels for pretty much all the various N scale models. They were available in several axle lengths, and had the most realistic (semi-scale) appearance from all the N scale wheels. So they were quickly adopted. Then they even came out with wider tread wheels - so even more choices for the modelers.
Do those springs work effectively in non-MT trucks? and/or with FVM (or other) wheelsets?That said, I've has some ER trucks which always seemed to roll as if they had drag springs or such in them... (All YMMV, I suspect, but perhaps not...)Ed
For a long time I've wondered if it would be practical to deliver power to a locomotive via induction. Mount a series of emitter coils along the underside of the track, and a pickup coil in the loco fuel tank. Wouldn't be practical for a whole layout, but maybe just yards and switching areas.
Pete:NWSL and IM were selling metal replacement wheels before FVM existed. IM's wheels did not have the best appearance but were cheaper than NWSL. NWSL had emplacement wheels sets for about everything decades ago.Kind regards,Bill
Randy - I just checked the FVM website and they are not even listing that they sell wheels for N scale. Just HO and TT.
@ednadolski Here's a short video of one of my RS-3's coupling on to a 50' boxcar (I think this is an Atlas boxcar, but I can't remember). Both the boxcar and RS-3 have MT1015 couplers; body-mounted on the boxcar. The boxcar has MT trucks and lo-profile wheels with retarding springs on one side of each of two axles. The car has been weighted to 1 oz. See if this is good enough for you on the switching front.John C.@jdcolombo - you might want to check the wheelsets of the boxcar. You appear to have an out-of-round wheel because the end of the car is bobbing up & down.