0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
I came across this a few times, mostly with the Thrall well car. Both are cast zinc and both can be susceptible to zinc craze like early engine frames.I vividly remember getting a blue (CSX? APL?) well car in a batch of used stuff. It was so comically warped that I was able to break it in my hand without much force at all. It turned into nothing more than splinters and power.
The Walthers cars always struck me as grossly oversized. Are their prototypes really that much larger than the prototypes of the Red Caboose models?
Much like the Atlas SD35 frame that disintegrated when I was finally able to get the body shell of it because I needed to check it for contact issues. I still haven't been able to find a replacement. Sad because it was a damn good locomotive. Jeff
I think it's just a an inherent risk of using a zinc alloy. I would love to know a little more about the metallurgy of it and what contamination caused zinc to craze like this. I wonder if it's like gallium and aluminum.
Well, if you can't fix it (and if there's no warranty in sight), throw some trucks and couplers on it and throw it on the RIP track. Perhaps with the overweight load still onboard. DFF
I already wrote this one off as FUBAR. My concern is that I go through the trouble of upgrading another one, just to have this happen again...
The Railwire is not your personal army.
I shot this recently - there are different sized hoods on this car. The hoods on the Walthers (now Atlas) car may not be the most common but they may not be wrong either.
Walthers vs (broken) Red Caboose hoods on Red Caboose car. The appearance that the Walthers cover sits higher is due to the fact that it is wider than the Red Caboose cover.[url=https://www.therailwire.net/forum/index.php?action=gallery;sa=view&id=17750]