0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Since the winning bidder bid $30 on the evening of March 30.And then immediately made only ONE more bid of $321.00...... And NEVER bid again....I honestly wonder if he MEANT to bid $32.10If so..... he's had a headache of a Sunday today.
For those of you that go back to the old Atlas board..... It reminds me of one of the last times I highlighted something like this.There was a Kato F3 shell that was involved in a much smaller bidding war- but a war none the less.The shell went for something like $60....... and that was when you could buy the same exact painted shell from Kato for $25!I posted.... Hey everybody. Look at this!A day later, a guy on the Atlas board admitted it was him. He was embarrassed at what he had done.
The frame has deteriorated too. It's loaded with cracks.
It must be remembered that not all of Rivarossi's frames suffered. I have several that are just fine and have been for many, many years. It's all a matter of the formulation of the various metals involved. Rivarossi did have a poor percentage, however.
Well, if the ending price was a typo, the high bidder might be able to back out of the deal, but even then, the 2nd highest bidder will pay almost as much. Unless the entire auction is nullified - then the loco will likely be relisted.