Author Topic: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0  (Read 64952 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bendtracker1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1466
  • Remember The Rock!
  • Respect: +1398
    • The Little Rock Line

packers#1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1477
  • Gender: Male
  • Modern Shortline Modeler
  • Respect: +562
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #466 on: January 28, 2024, 04:03:59 PM »
+1
Interesting that to get to either of the tracks with flat cars on them, a switcher would have to enter the building, or, do they use some type of carmobile to move them?

It’s likely similar to the GE Turbine plant here, they have an interplant layout with a turntable and everything because they build the turbines on flatcars and then either transfer them to a heavy haul flatcar, big rig, or a heavy lift helicopter.
Sawyer Berry
Clemson University graduate, c/o 2018
American manufacturing isn’t dead, it’s just gotten high tech

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3602
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #467 on: January 28, 2024, 04:15:35 PM »
0
Oh, those flatcars are for moving stuff around their yard.  They don't go anywhere.   Also of note,  I believe they are ex WM flats

milw156

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 592
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +237
    • Modutrak
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #468 on: February 01, 2024, 04:42:34 PM »
0
Voith Hydro plant about 7 o'clock to Weldon solutions. right above the wye track

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3602
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #469 on: February 01, 2024, 04:46:35 PM »
0
Voith Hydro plant about 7 o'clock to Weldon solutions. right above the wye track

Yep, figured it out after reading follow up comments

milw156

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 592
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +237
    • Modutrak
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #470 on: February 02, 2024, 01:37:23 PM »
0
Its quite the "model railroady" track arrangement

wm3798

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 16124
  • Gender: Male
  • I like models. She likes antiques. Perfect!
  • Respect: +6467
    • Western Maryland Railway Western Lines
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #471 on: February 02, 2024, 03:18:31 PM »
+1



Here's your sign!


Rockin' It Old School

Lee Weldon www.wmrywesternlines.net

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3602
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #472 on: February 03, 2024, 11:18:48 PM »
+4
No pictures tonight but YorkRail has now been granted access westbound out to the Rt 30 bypass.  Hooked up track leads to buss, fired everything up.  No shorts !  Ran engines light from Zarfoss the Lincoln, picked up a cut of cars and took them back out to Zarfoss.  No power drop outs, no derailments.  Even across the lift out, no issues.


« Last Edit: February 04, 2024, 06:17:00 PM by mu26aeh »

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3602
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #473 on: February 10, 2024, 11:39:41 PM »
+2
I turned a corner (literally) tonight, and installed the Baker siding/run around.  This will allow the Zarfoss job to pull into the runaround, drop their train and head back in the other direction.  Also allows them to switch out the Kloeckner Metals siding which is a trailing point siding going back into Lincoln yard.


seusscaboose

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2064
  • Respect: +194
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #474 on: February 11, 2024, 09:31:01 AM »
0
Lurking and loving it
"I have a train full of basements"

NKPH&TS #3589

Inspiration at:
http://nkphts.org/modelersnotebook

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3602
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #475 on: February 16, 2024, 11:18:06 PM »
+3
Benchwork has turned a corner, literally.  I set out to get the benchwork up for Spring Grove today.  This will be the home of PH Glatfelter, now Pixelle, a large paper mill.  They have a chipping plant just up the road and use conveyors to move the chip on the plant property and store in large piles, as well as a few coal trains a month even though they've recently changed some of their operations over to using natural gas.  Plenty of inbound and outbound boxcars and tankcars, covered hoppers.  Should provide a lot of switching if I can get all the track planned out correctly.  I've also included a track chart laid out over a satellite image





Tracks E, F, and K are no longer used or in service.  As matter of fact, where K is located is now a truck shipping dock and some claim as the hardest truck dock in the USA.  I'm certain it's very high on the list.


John

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 13386
  • Respect: +3245
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #476 on: February 17, 2024, 08:01:00 AM »
0
Great progress -- I'm beginning to think I picked the wrong subdivision :)

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3602
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #477 on: February 19, 2024, 11:38:38 PM »
+5
Sketching Spring Grove, getting closer to having it figured out.





Might bring the track going from right to left ( S ) another foot or so closer to the bottom of photo, but that shortens my switching lead on the left lower corner.  It that case, I may bring cars thru the loop shown in the first photo, but not sure how often they use that track in real life.  I'll need to check with my sources

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3602
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #478 on: February 20, 2024, 08:49:29 PM »
0
Marching on to Porters Sideling !  Return loop leaving Spring Grove drawn up today.  Still have some work on the Pennsy side of the mill to finalize turnout location.



John

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 13386
  • Respect: +3245
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #479 on: February 21, 2024, 07:21:30 AM »
0
Marching on to Porters Sideling !  Return loop leaving Spring Grove drawn up today.  Still have some work on the Pennsy side of the mill to finalize turnout location.



Maybe move that curved switch away from the joint to to give you a place to put a tortoise or other mechanical under table linkage ..