Author Topic: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0  (Read 65020 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3603
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #255 on: December 21, 2021, 10:54:31 PM »
0
Ken threw a picture of the V&O track plan at me this evening.  On first look, the general flow might be something to ponder on .... 🤔



This was posted in a FB group, looks to be from RMC March 1973
« Last Edit: December 22, 2021, 01:22:30 AM by mu26aeh »

Philip H

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8910
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1655
    • Layout Progress Blog
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #256 on: December 21, 2021, 11:31:38 PM »
0
Well if the staff at MR can do we be MR&T as this years N scale project layout I think
Adapting the V&O would be top shelf.
Philip H.
Chief Everything Officer
Baton Rouge Southern RR - Mount Rainier Division.


davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11675
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +6801
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #257 on: December 22, 2021, 09:29:22 AM »
0
@mu26aeh,

Allen McClelland expanded that version of the V&O before it was dismantled.  You should try to find that track plan, too, because he made some interesting modifications to the old section during the reconstruction, e.g., the revision of the yard at Jimtown and the addition of a staging yard in the dispatcher's office.

Hope this helps,
DFF

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!

Wolf N Works

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 262
  • Respect: +83
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #258 on: December 22, 2021, 10:03:24 AM »
+2
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24733
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9249
    • Conrail 1285
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #259 on: December 22, 2021, 11:09:27 AM »
0
I have a few thoughts on using the V&O plan.

First, the subject is very different. Obviously you know that, but it means that things like vertical separation doesn't make the same sense it did for Allen.

Second, the V&O was visionary, but it also included very pioneering ideas, both good and bad. There has been a lot of thought on layout design since.

If you haven't read it, go get Thomas Klimoski's book: https://www.thomasklimoski.com/book It's worth every page.

I think you were also talking about primarily just using the V&O as an inspiration for flow and fitting things into your space. From that perspective it's a smart thing to do, just keep those things in mind.

Also, I am hereby volunteering to help develop the plan. I think I've said that before, but I'm making it official now.
You can ask @DeltaBravo about how that's (mostly) worked out on his WM layout.

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3603
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #260 on: December 22, 2021, 11:13:10 AM »
+1

I think you were also talking about primarily just using the V&O as an inspiration for flow and fitting things into your space. From that perspective it's a smart thing to do, just keep those things in mind.

Also, I am hereby volunteering to help develop the plan. I think I've said that before, but I'm making it official now.
You can ask @DeltaBravo about how that's (mostly) worked out on his WM layout.

Yes, merely as flow and fitting.  Kinda like I did with @Bendtracker1 bench work plans for my current 2.0.

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3603
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #261 on: December 25, 2021, 06:56:07 PM »
+4
Little bit of sanding, then some paint.  Ready for drop ceiling soon !




Think I'd rather ballast than mud....
« Last Edit: December 25, 2021, 08:03:30 PM by mu26aeh »

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3603
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #262 on: December 27, 2021, 02:56:41 PM »
+2
@DeltaBravo and I did some horse trading and I ended up with this beauty.  Could it be ?  Perhaps I'm backdating my layout to the days of WM steam ?



davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11675
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +6801
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #263 on: December 27, 2021, 03:21:29 PM »
+2
Is that the roundhouse that used to be Lee’s?  I’m sure he’d love it, if you were to install it, fix it up nicely, and then abandon and tear it down.  :trollface:

DFF

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3603
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #264 on: December 27, 2021, 03:22:44 PM »
0
Is that the roundhouse that used to be Lee’s?  I’m sure he’d love it, if you were to install it, fix it up nicely, and then abandon and tear it down.  :trollface:

DFF

No, Lee said his roundhouse was off limits.  For some reason he doesn't trust the kitty company  :?

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11675
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +6801
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #265 on: December 27, 2021, 03:27:57 PM »
0
No, Lee said his roundhouse was off limits.  For some reason he doesn't trust the kitty company  :?

He hates the C&O for what happened after the C&O took control of the B&O and then what the C&O/B&O did to the WM when they took control it.  I was modeling the C&O the first time I met him.  I was afraid he was going to kick me out of his house when I posed two C&O GP9s on his Casselman Crossing scene.

DFF

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3603
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #266 on: December 27, 2021, 08:28:12 PM »
0
Well, now I gotta give more room for Ag-Com, as I'll need to model the parking lot and truck loading to showcase these new models from Baldylox

https://www.etsy.com/listing/1135313190/n-scale-feed-trailer?ref=shop_home_active_1

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3603
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #267 on: January 01, 2022, 06:11:44 PM »
+1
Picked this up today, thanks to @wm3798 , now I got a place to store all of my equipment.  And buy a whole lot more :D



mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5377
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3603
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #268 on: January 02, 2022, 12:33:58 PM »
+1
Here's assembled pic, map/blueprint cabinet.  Lots of storage potential there 😁



MK

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4065
  • Respect: +772
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision 3.0 - A design discussion
« Reply #269 on: January 02, 2022, 12:54:15 PM »
0
I love me one of those!  But they are pricey though.
« Last Edit: January 02, 2022, 03:58:01 PM by MK »