0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
LOL! You should have heard my evil cackle when I read your post. I have few more nifty holders for variosu things. I shoudl start a separate thread about them.
….At one point I planned on building a whole bunch of custom holders. Then I found myself with, oh about a billion, used IPA bottles thanks to resin printing. So I just use those....
My Rock Island BL-2 is ready for paint --(I hope) -
Those aren't the IPA bottles I first thought of.
Did CRI&P run its BL-2s as far west as Tucumcari? ...
Also, I couldn't find any images of their BL2s operating in m.u. - always a single, usually in commuter service. Were they m.u. equipped? Hard to tell in the photos. If no m.u., then no reason to be in a consist that far West, Tucumcari was nothing more than a hand-off to SP.
Come to think of it, the most western (as identified) picture I found was in Peoria, so I even have to wonder if they ever made it out of Illinois.
Did CRI&P add their own steam generators?
Pair of RI BL2s: http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=164412BL2 with E7s: http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=663553RI BL2 in KC: http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=4873174
Tucumcari was nothing more than a hand-off to SP.
@Mark W - Then I found myself with, oh about a billion, used IPA bottles thanks to resin printing.
Oh, yes, I am not unaware of that. As the gentleman who is constructing this model is an SP modeller, when you consider CRI&P and SP, Tucumcari comes to mind. His pike, however, is unmistakably 1950s California.From some other commenters, it appears that CRI&P bought the things without steam generators. They may or may not have had MU lines. The railroad's adding the steam generators rather than LaGrange's doing it would explain the unusual stack configuration. The B&M's and C&O's stack above the cab resembles that on the CRI&P's, but there is a minor, but spottable, difference. The B&M's and C&O's lack the vent stacks on the short hood, which CRI&P's have.I have read that the body construction was not very strong on these things. If WM ran theirs on road trains in MU consists, they almost always had to be on the point. I have read that the shops were constantly welding stress cracks on the frames.CRI&P had some interesting consists and proto-bashes. There was a short Classic Trains article about Train Number Fifteen. It referred to it as a "modeller's dream", or words similar. The power was an FM road swticher. There was a HW baggage, a LW coach, an RDC-3 and two HW cars behind the RDC in consist. Most of the train was left in a terminal somewhere, but, the RDC finished the trip alone somewhere into Texas. I had to wonder if CRI&P added pass through steam lines on the RDC so that the cars behind it could be heated (the article mentioned that it was cold outside). The RDC would not need the heat from the locomotive's steam generator, as it had its own electric heat. I also have to wonder if the RDC ran in Georgia Overdrive while it was in-consist. Would that not have been hard on the hydraulic transmission on those things?My favourite CRI&P protobash shows an RDC as it is towing a LW corrugated boat tailed observation that the railroad had turned into a baggage/passenger combine. Guess which end got the baggage door? It does make sense that the observation end would get it, as, if you put the baggage door at the other end, the passengers who wanted to sit in the observation end would have to go through the baggage compartment. Railroads generally did not want passengers in the baggage compartments.
Does make me think about what ATSF would have done with one, they went with dual-service torpedo-tube GP7's in zebra-stripe in that era.