0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
'Born in 1956. Modeling the GM&O in 1972.
By the NumbersI'll take this break in the action (...wow!...) to post refreshed stats:Responses: 68No direct experience of modeling period: 62%Transition (1945-1959): 37%Decline (1960-1980): 34%Influenced by childhood memories: 18%Modern: 16%Average/Median Age: 52/54Average/Median Era: 1970/1965Notes:For the several of you expressing multiple eras, I took the middle weighted by your indicated strongest preference.For the few who might not know the difference between "average" and "median", "average" is the total divided by the number of entries, kinda "just a number". Take two 80-year-olds and a 20-year-old as a group, you get an average age of 60, which means nothing, there are no 60-year-olds in the cohort. Median is the middle of the pack - half are above, half are below. That the median birth year and median era are both 1965 blows my mind.Back to "conventional wisdom"... first, the reliving childhood theory is mostly bunk. <20% is not significant. And then there's modern, which is now down to just 1/6 of the sample. So, explain to me why so many manufacturers are pursuing this market.The best observation so far came from my wife Robyn today, over lunch. Telling her about the survey, without prompting she said, "Well, duh, they're reliving their childhood experiences." At that point I laughed and said, "Not so fast!", explaining the responses didn't support this conclusion. After some back-and-forth, she offered, "OK, they are modeling periods when railroads were interesting, with lots of variety." Bingo.