0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Any idea what the wheel diameter and axle spacing is?
Does anyone know if those drivers are interchangeable with the USRA Mikado? I could use one driver for a Erie Mikado.
Pete,Having never dissected a Kato steam locomotive, was wondering if the drive wheels are constructed like those on the Atlas Moguls?The reason for the question is because as I recall, DKS made an aftermarket cast resin replacement spoked center for the Mogul locomotive drivers.A similar solution might resolve the Boxpox driver issue.
Yes, Like Atlas Moguls or Americans this loco has solid-back metal drivers with plastic inserts for the detailed wheel face. I would have to check how easy it is to remove them.
Now that you mention it, DKS formerly manufactured replacement driver inserts for the Atlas American locomotives.Depending upon how easy it is to remove inserts, you might actually wind up assisting Kato in selling some of these JNR mechanisms.
I took my Kato D 51 apart.This is the older (original?) run of these models. I think that is the mechanism Kato is selling. I believe the latest run has a totally redesigned mechanism which uses a coreless motor.As you can see, the gearing and side rod design is similar to their Mikado. Also notice that the axle tube of the front driver is split. The 3rd driver's axle tube with the gear is also split (not visible). So that could be something to watch out for.As for the driver design, the metal part of the driver (tire, flange and wheel-back) are not keyed for the plastic spoke insert. Then the spoke and the half-axle are all one piece press-fit into the metal wheel. The quartering and alignment with gear teeth is accomplished by using squared off shape for the axle tube home and the plastic half-axle. If one wanted to replace the spoke insert with another type of spokes, the new casting would have to include the half-axle in the back. I would not trust rather brittle casting resin or even a 3D printed part for that job. But that is just my opinion. As for the driver design, the metal part of the driver (tire, flange and wheel-back) are not keyed for the plastic spoke insert. Then the spoke and the half-axle are all one piece press-fit into the metal wheel. The quartering and alignment with gear teeth is accomplished by using squared off shape for the axle tube home and the plastic half-axle. If one wanted to replace the spoke insert with another type of spokes, the new casting would have to include the half-axle in the back. I would not trust rather brittle casting resin or even a 3D printed part for that job. But that is just my opinion. @wcfn100 : Jason, I think it would make sense to add "D51 2-8-2" to the subject line for future searches.
As for the driver design, the metal part of the driver (tire, flange and wheel-back) are not keyed for the plastic spoke insert. Then the spoke and the half-axle are all one piece press-fit into the metal wheel.
If one wanted to replace the spoke insert with another type of spokes, the new casting would have to include the half-axle in the back. I would not trust rather brittle casting resin or even a 3D printed part for that job. But that is just my opinion.
If the metal parts are not keyed for the plastic ones, once the plastic spoke insert has been worn due to continued use, what prevents the metal portions of the drivers from spinning separately from the press-fit plastic castings (i.e., like circa 1960s - 1970s N Scale trucks with wheel-sets that were constructed of chemically blackened metal and/or nickel silver rims that were mounted on plastic hubs that were attached to either brass or steel axles do)?