Author Topic: HO somewhere in Appalachia.....  (Read 86981 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

LIRR

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1285
  • Respect: +1804
Re: HO somewhere in Appalachia.....
« Reply #540 on: December 25, 2022, 06:28:56 PM »
+4
Changed plans…..although I found a way to quickly add the strapping, it turns out I’d need 3-dozen bundles to adequately fill the lumber shed. I don’t have enough wood for this. So instead of having the track-side of the shed open for loading from the yard I closed the back of the shed as in the photo.  About 10 bundles will be enough to add detail to the yard…..


« Last Edit: December 29, 2022, 09:53:51 AM by LIRR »

LIRR

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1285
  • Respect: +1804
Re: HO somewhere in Appalachia.....
« Reply #541 on: January 01, 2023, 10:53:40 AM »
+4
Working on the track-through-the-wall at Wiegand…..

Adding scenery and ballast as far as the eye can see. I added lighting on the other side. That takes away the darkened tunnel look…

« Last Edit: January 04, 2023, 02:11:41 PM by LIRR »

LIRR

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1285
  • Respect: +1804
Re: HO somewhere in Appalachia.....
« Reply #542 on: January 14, 2023, 08:39:18 PM »
+6
Background scenery behind the opening finished…..

Here’s the view:
 




…and the view from behind…




CRR Chase

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 156
  • Respect: +78
Re: HO somewhere in Appalachia.....
« Reply #543 on: January 17, 2023, 02:45:31 PM »
0
I am wanting to model this time of year in the Appalachians also. What are you using for your Photo Backdrops?

CRR Chase

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 156
  • Respect: +78
Re: HO somewhere in Appalachia.....
« Reply #544 on: January 17, 2023, 02:59:48 PM »
0
I am wanting to model this time of year in the Appalachians also. What are you using for your Photo Backdrops?

I found where you said these were LARC.
Do you know which file you used? They look good.

LIRR

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1285
  • Respect: +1804
Re: HO somewhere in Appalachia.....
« Reply #545 on: January 18, 2023, 08:51:08 AM »
0
this is the only one from LARC:



I don't remember the file.....

all the others are images from the internet printed on the office copier and taped together....

CRR Chase

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 156
  • Respect: +78
Re: HO somewhere in Appalachia.....
« Reply #546 on: January 18, 2023, 10:47:28 AM »
0
Oh ok, they look fantastic. You did an excellent job with them.. I want to also Use photos. I bought a Drone just for that purpose.
Thanks for answering my questions. I model the Clinchfield in N scale, this is right up my alley.

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24738
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9251
    • Conrail 1285
Re: HO somewhere in Appalachia.....
« Reply #547 on: January 18, 2023, 10:52:56 AM »
+1
Oh ok, they look fantastic. You did an excellent job with them.. I want to also Use photos. I bought a Drone just for that purpose.
Thanks for answering my questions. I model the Clinchfield in N scale, this is right up my alley.

The drone thing is really interesting. I want to see how that turns out.

I've spent a lot of time on backdrop images lately, including two days spent seeking out source material. It's time well spent, but time that can ONLY be spent at the right time of the year.

LIRR

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1285
  • Respect: +1804
Re: HO somewhere in Appalachia.....
« Reply #548 on: January 18, 2023, 12:52:18 PM »
+1
I've seen awesome backdrop photos of layouts on TRW and elsewhere. Some are difficult to even tell it's a photo.

if you're looking for great layout photos then a great backdrop can make or break your photo.  In my case I'm just trying to eliminate the distraction as they eye is drawn to the train room wall instead of the scene before me. So I barely notice the pieced together photos. If the train isn't passing thru the scene my attention is elsewhere. If the train is passing thru, I'm watching the train and the backdrop is behind building and trees in most places. Foreground scenery and details to draw the eye are the key. It's like a 2-dimensional  table and lamp painted on the wall as scenery for a play. When the actors are on stage you barely notice they're painted on but your minds eye registers "table and lamp"....

When switching here, I don't even notice the toilet paper roll in the photo. I keep forgetting it's there. I need to come up with something to transition from the end of (the only LARC) backdrop ...


« Last Edit: January 22, 2023, 07:12:20 PM by LIRR »

CRR Chase

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 156
  • Respect: +78
Re: HO somewhere in Appalachia.....
« Reply #549 on: January 18, 2023, 01:45:22 PM »
0
What printer, and paper are you using?

CRR Chase

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 156
  • Respect: +78
Re: HO somewhere in Appalachia.....
« Reply #550 on: January 18, 2023, 01:51:35 PM »
0
The drone thing is really interesting. I want to see how that turns out.

I've spent a lot of time on backdrop images lately, including two days spent seeking out source material. It's time well spent, but time that can ONLY be spent at the right time of the year.

I was going to ask you the same question I asked LIRR.
What paper and printer are you using? Also.. The Drone can give the height you might need for the desired look..
« Last Edit: January 18, 2023, 01:53:46 PM by CRR Chase »

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24738
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9251
    • Conrail 1285
Re: HO somewhere in Appalachia.....
« Reply #551 on: January 18, 2023, 02:30:02 PM »
0
I was going to ask you the same question I asked LIRR.
What paper and printer are you using? Also.. The Drone can give the height you might need for the desired look..

I've got one of these: https://epson.com/For-Work/Printers/Large-Format/SureColor-T2170-24-Inch-Wireless-Printer/p/SCT2170SR

Be warned: it's BIG.

I've currently got a roll of matte photo paper in it.

CRR Chase

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 156
  • Respect: +78
Re: HO somewhere in Appalachia.....
« Reply #552 on: January 19, 2023, 07:57:49 AM »
0
I've got one of these: https://epson.com/For-Work/Printers/Large-Format/SureColor-T2170-24-Inch-Wireless-Printer/p/SCT2170SR

Be warned: it's BIG.

I've currently got a roll of matte photo paper in it.

Ok, is inkjet preferred over lazer (I have inkjet)? also is there a good tip for getting a photo to print in series with no border? I  have a Pano shot or two I would like to print out of my 8x11 printer at home. However I am kinda dumb about all of this. I found a way to print without a boarder, but not in series yet.

dem34

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1660
  • Gender: Male
  • Only here to learn through Osmosis
  • Respect: +1192
Re: HO somewhere in Appalachia.....
« Reply #553 on: January 19, 2023, 08:29:41 AM »
+1
For images Inkjet is preferred, but be aware it burns through ink quick in that role.
-Al

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24738
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9251
    • Conrail 1285
Re: HO somewhere in Appalachia.....
« Reply #554 on: January 19, 2023, 11:09:59 AM »
+1
Ok, is inkjet preferred over lazer (I have inkjet)? also is there a good tip for getting a photo to print in series with no border? I  have a Pano shot or two I would like to print out of my 8x11 printer at home. However I am kinda dumb about all of this. I found a way to print without a boarder, but not in series yet.

So I went inkjet because the laser equivalent likely added a 0 to the price.

As for ink, well, I absolutely benefit from the fact that my skies are gray.

But also, the ink replacement cost on this thing isn't out of line with ink costs for other inkjets. I was pleasantly surprised by that.

As for printing without a border, I never figured that out before this thing, but I DID realize that Adobe Indesign allowed me to do print across multiple sheets with a specified amount of overlap (so each page had about 1/2" of overlap at the edges, but I could control that amount). That allowed me to cut one sheet (it also provided crop marks in the margin) and then paste it on top of the next for seamlessness.

It worked, but looked better in photos than in person.



vs