0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Wow more expensive than Scale trains and two of the UP number are duplicates.
If these were designed by FVM, I wonder why they didn't release them themselves?
I get the feeling N scale will be run into the ground by all of this redundancy. It's not like they're covered wagons, which were owned by lots and lots of railroads.
Unless IM redesigned them, they'll probably have the dimples.
If its true the T4 "was designed be FVM", there's probably a lot going on behind the scenes that none of us will ever know about.. . . They don't have the excuse of the decoder not being ready, but hopefully ESU can ramp up production of the decoder to cover the new models developed for it (has anyone seen one on the open market?). It would be hard as hell to pick up something like this midway through the project. It's likely IMR thought long and hard about doing this, so like I said, there's probably a lot going on here. Bill Kepner
A T4 bonanza, and I heard a whisper about Kato too...
Glad they explained it (https://intermountain-railway.com/modelersclub/). I'm happy to hear it's a FVM design. I like the performance of the mechanism, ease of converting to DCC (6 pin) and the detail pack (hopefully IM will have those too).
IMRC mechanisms are jacked up like clown cars.
Kato should focus on NS C44-9W's, SP AC4400's and bringing out the AC4400 and SD70MAC in CSX YN3.