Author Topic: Cells getting decent shots  (Read 17158 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

havingfuntoo

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 322
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +10
Re: Cells getting decent shots
« Reply #75 on: October 30, 2017, 06:14:58 PM »
+2
Oh come on Peteski, a couple of down votes keeps you on your toes, you can spare them. Let the sad individual feel like he has be an achiever.
You are just too sensitive under that boiler plated exterior, and Bob you are such a kill joy. ps it is not me, only once have I voted some one down, I was infuriated by their attitude. I am happy to put my name to a vote, if requested.

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 32937
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5336
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Cells getting decent shots
« Reply #76 on: October 30, 2017, 07:31:31 PM »
0
Oh come on Peteski, a couple of down votes keeps you on your toes, you can spare them. Let the sad individual feel like he has be an achiever.
You are just too sensitive under that boiler plated exterior, and Bob you are such a kill joy. ps it is not me, only once have I voted some one down, I was infuriated by their attitude. I am happy to put my name to a vote, if requested.

I'm assuming that your post was serious.
It is not about my vote count or being sensitive - it is is about the principal of the thing.  I stand up for myself!   :) And if I am raining on someone's acrid need to down-vote posts (while hiding their identity behind a computer screen) for apparently no good or valid reason, I'm not sorry about that. Being an achiever in mischief or in being a miserable person is not something anybody should strive for.  Sounds like you vote for logical reasons so you wouldn't mind being identified.  Others might not like being exposed for their negative votes.
. . . 42 . . .

chicken45

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4500
  • Gender: Male
  • Will rim for upvotes.
  • Respect: +1013
    • Facebook Profile
Re: Cells getting decent shots
« Reply #77 on: October 30, 2017, 08:43:47 PM »
+4
I'm assuming that your post was serious.
It is not about my vote count or being sensitive - it is is about the principal of the thing.  I stand up for myself!   :) And if I am raining on someone's acrid need to down-vote posts (while hiding their identity behind a computer screen) for apparently no good or valid reason, I'm not sorry about that. Being an achiever in mischief or in being a miserable person is not something anybody should strive for.  Sounds like you vote for logical reasons so you wouldn't mind being identified.  Others might not like being exposed for their negative votes.

I just gave you a down vote for no good of valid reason!

Josh Surkosky

Here's a Clerihew about Ed. K.

Ed Kapucinski
Every night, he plants a new tree.
But mention his law
and you've pulled your last straw!

Alternate version:
Ed Kapucinski
Every night, he plants a new tree.
He asks excitedly "Did you say Ménage à Trois?"
No, I said "Ed's Law."

Jbub

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1849
  • Gender: Male
  • HP 9999
  • Respect: +583
Re: Cells getting decent shots
« Reply #78 on: October 30, 2017, 09:04:12 PM »
0
I just gave you a down vote for no good of valid reason!


I can't decide whether to up or down vote this.   :?  :trollface:
"Noooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!"

Darth Vader

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 32937
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5336
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Cells getting decent shots
« Reply #79 on: October 30, 2017, 09:26:14 PM »
+1
I can't decide whether to up or down vote this.   :?  :trollface:

Whatever you do, I'll do the opposite to nullify yours!   :)
. . . 42 . . .

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11675
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +6801
Re: Cells getting decent shots
« Reply #80 on: October 30, 2017, 10:34:59 PM »
+1
I can't decide whether to up or down vote this.   :?  :trollface:

Well, seeing that it has a typo in that "1" instead of a fourth exclamation point, I suggest a downvote.   :trollface:

DFF

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 32937
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5336
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Cells getting decent shots
« Reply #81 on: October 30, 2017, 10:46:19 PM »
+1
Wow!  Looks like my previous post hit a nerve -- 3 down-votes so far!  I'm controversial! How cool is that!?  8)

Too bad that that the vote counts display does not show both down- and up-vote counts separately instead of just the total.
« Last Edit: October 30, 2017, 10:48:13 PM by peteski »
. . . 42 . . .

Missaberoad

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3562
  • Gender: Male
  • Ryan in Alberta
  • Respect: +1165
Re: Cells getting decent shots
« Reply #82 on: October 30, 2017, 10:53:40 PM »
+3
The Railwire is not your personal army.  :trollface:

Cajonpassfan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5393
  • Respect: +1961
Re: Cells getting decent shots
« Reply #83 on: October 30, 2017, 11:08:50 PM »
0
Well, I came here to learn about cell phones getting decent shots. How silly of me :facepalm:
Otto K.

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 32937
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5336
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Cells getting decent shots
« Reply #84 on: October 30, 2017, 11:11:42 PM »
+1
Well, I came here to learn about cell phones getting decent shots. How silly of me :facepalm:
Otto K.

Typical thread-drift. This is the Railwire after all!   :D

I suppose we should now return to the regularly scheduled topic.   :)
. . . 42 . . .

basementcalling

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3540
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +751
Re: Cells getting decent shots
« Reply #85 on: October 31, 2017, 12:35:13 AM »
+1
Well, seeing that it has a typo in that "1" instead of a fourth exclamation point, I suggest a downvote.   :trollface:

DFF

Grammar Nazi.  :)
Peter Pfotenhauer

basementcalling

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3540
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +751
Re: Cells getting decent shots
« Reply #86 on: October 31, 2017, 12:36:31 AM »
+1
Well, I came here to learn about cell phones getting decent shots. How silly of me :facepalm:
Otto K.

What were you thinking?
Peter Pfotenhauer

havingfuntoo

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 322
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +10
Re: Cells getting decent shots
« Reply #87 on: October 31, 2017, 02:51:34 AM »
+2
I'm assuming that your post was serious.
It is not about my vote count or being sensitive - it is is about the principal of the thing.  I stand up for myself!   :) And if I am raining on someone's acrid need to down-vote posts (while hiding their identity behind a computer screen) for apparently no good or valid reason, I'm not sorry about that. Being an achiever in mischief or in being a miserable person is not something anybody should strive for.  Sounds like you vote for logical reasons so you wouldn't mind being identified.  Others might not like being exposed for their negative votes.

It is much more fun to go fishing when the fish are on the bite.
I don't vote very often, I would like to think my vote is valued by the receiver. This tit for tat voting, and sour grapes attitude expressed in negative votes really has no place here, it is looking more like a mothers club, or school gate club.
Seriously, I would like to see some accountability with regard to the voters and their vote, if I have served up a serious dose of it in a posting then you can be sure if the relevant posters vote diminishes by one or more after my post, I have been involved. If you want clarification ...... just ask, I am always and always will be happy to discuss the merits or lack of, from my perspective.

I would like to see a brief reason explaining a negative vote attached to the negative vote before it was able to be applied, to move away from the bitchiness that has developed and make voters more accountable. This is now sounding messy .......... bet I get voted down for it ..........   
 

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 32937
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5336
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Cells getting decent shots
« Reply #88 on: October 31, 2017, 03:25:21 AM »
0

I would like to see a brief reason explaining a negative vote attached to the negative vote before it was able to be applied, to move away from the bitchiness that has developed and make voters more accountable. This is now sounding messy .......... bet I get voted down for it ..........   
 

Not when it's up to me. What you wrote made sense: up-vote for you!

I also noticed that my previous posts here keep accumulating down-votes - excellent Mr. Smithers, excellent!  :D
« Last Edit: October 31, 2017, 03:36:53 AM by peteski »
. . . 42 . . .

Lemosteam

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5919
  • Gender: Male
  • PRR, The Standard Railroad of my World
  • Respect: +3666
    • Designer at Keystone Details
Re: Cells getting decent shots
« Reply #89 on: October 31, 2017, 10:18:49 AM »
+1
ZZZZZZZzzzzzz.... what?  What just happened? :trollface: :trollface: :trollface: :trollface: :trollface: