Author Topic: Conrail NW2 9253  (Read 15671 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

chicken45

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4500
  • Gender: Male
  • Will rim for upvotes.
  • Respect: +1013
    • Facebook Profile
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #45 on: March 22, 2017, 05:43:41 PM »
0
Wait... what if you sprayed paint without stripping it?
Josh Surkosky

Here's a Clerihew about Ed. K.

Ed Kapucinski
Every night, he plants a new tree.
But mention his law
and you've pulled your last straw!

Alternate version:
Ed Kapucinski
Every night, he plants a new tree.
He asks excitedly "Did you say Ménage à Trois?"
No, I said "Ed's Law."

sd45elect2000

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1101
  • Respect: +452
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #46 on: March 22, 2017, 05:44:32 PM »
0
I use weathering to cover flaws on actual locomotives, why not?

Randy

wazzou

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6729
  • #GoCougs
  • Respect: +1655
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #47 on: March 22, 2017, 06:04:33 PM »
+1
Wait... what if you sprayed paint without stripping it?


Paint would still attach to all of the high and low spots when sprayed, so if you're thinking it would only fill in the low spots, probably not likely.
I think Ed is happy the way it is and if he isn't worried about the louvers, he won't sweat the paint which certainly doesn't look horrible.
Bryan

Member of NPRHA, Modeling Committee Member
http://www.nprha.org/
Member of MRHA


daniel_leavitt2000

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6346
  • Respect: +1307
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #48 on: March 22, 2017, 08:37:57 PM »
+1
There's a shyness found in reason
Apprehensive influence swallow away
You seem to feel abysmal take it
Then you're careful grace for sure
Kinda like the way you're breathing
Kinda like the way you keep looking away

cbroughton67

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 536
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1713
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #49 on: March 22, 2017, 09:45:07 PM »
0
I totally get what you're saying. Putting soot up there isn't to compensate for a lack in talent or technique. It's realistic, and it happens to fix the color match.
Ed now has an airbrush. I'm trying to convince him to use it!!
He said he's bringing it tonight to Thirsty Modeling so I'll get to see it tonight, and after looking it with my loupe, endless chide him during our Supertree Marathon.



I'm right there with both of you. I weather my stuff, because it just doesn't look prototypical (IMO) if it's totally clean. If it's not dirty, it doesn't go on the layout. That said, I have totally benefitted from the fact that the same "weathering because it's prototypical" just happened to hide some boo-boos all at the same time. Win-Win!


Hey, I can use some Fall Supertrees, if you feel like making extra! Tell @Ed Kapuscinski there's some Bourbon Barrel Ale in it for you guys!  :D
Chris Broughton
MMR #650

Darwin was an optimist.

chicken45

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4500
  • Gender: Male
  • Will rim for upvotes.
  • Respect: +1013
    • Facebook Profile
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #50 on: March 22, 2017, 09:50:07 PM »
0
I was able to take some damning photos of this NW2. Look upon these with disgust and contempt!













John's lights look good, tho.
 :trollface:
Josh Surkosky

Here's a Clerihew about Ed. K.

Ed Kapucinski
Every night, he plants a new tree.
But mention his law
and you've pulled your last straw!

Alternate version:
Ed Kapucinski
Every night, he plants a new tree.
He asks excitedly "Did you say Ménage à Trois?"
No, I said "Ed's Law."

choochin3

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 675
  • Respect: +5
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #51 on: March 22, 2017, 10:13:44 PM »
0
Make it Pennsy again :trollface:
Carl T.
President of the Cape James Terminal Lines.

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24747
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9272
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #52 on: March 22, 2017, 10:16:15 PM »
+2
YOU MONSTER, YOU SAID YOU WOULDN'T POST THOSE!!!

I thought they were just for us. Jeez.  :scared:




Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.  :trollface: :ashat: :D :tommann:

Missaberoad

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3569
  • Gender: Male
  • Ryan in Alberta
  • Respect: +1170
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #53 on: March 22, 2017, 10:21:24 PM »
+1
Look upon these with disgust and contempt!
/>
I will say if that is brush painted its an amazing brush painting job!

At the end of the day Ed needs to decide if he will be happy with the end product, if the answer is without hesitation yes, then push forward...
If there's any doubt then strip it and find some archer louvers while you're at it. :) doing it over will be worth it if there's any hint of being unsatisfied...

As far as weathering, even professional movie prop makers use weathering to "hide their crimes", there is a whole bunch of grey between solely weathering for realism and Outcome based hide it with dirt :)


The Railwire is not your personal army.  :trollface:

daniel_leavitt2000

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6346
  • Respect: +1307
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #54 on: March 22, 2017, 11:42:32 PM »
+2
YOU MONSTER, YOU SAID YOU WOULDN'T POST THOSE!!!

I thought they were just for us. Jeez.  :scared:

---- Pretty much what every girl ever said to their boyfriend
There's a shyness found in reason
Apprehensive influence swallow away
You seem to feel abysmal take it
Then you're careful grace for sure
Kinda like the way you're breathing
Kinda like the way you keep looking away

chessie system fan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1158
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +659
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #55 on: March 22, 2017, 11:45:47 PM »
+3
Yeah maybe lightly sand the roof and cab sides to get rid of the bumps and you should be okay... this time. :ashat:

Like this:

Aaron Bearden

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24747
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9272
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #56 on: March 22, 2017, 11:48:46 PM »
0
Would these headlight prints work for a Lifelike SWwhatever you want it to be ?  I was looking for some a while back for engines for @Blazeman

Sorry this got lost in the fray.

Not really, unless you're trying to turn the SW9/1200 into an SW7, because the big "bucket" version John's done is different than the pointier SW8/9/1200 version.

The later ones, like the ones on LL units look like this.

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Note the "face" is narrower and the taper sharper.

I believe EMD changed the style over either sometime during the SW7 production or between it and the SW8 and SW9. I also believe (I could be wrong) that generally the larger "steam engine" style lights corresponded to the "arched" cab windows as well, or at least largely so.

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24747
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9272
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #57 on: March 22, 2017, 11:49:43 PM »
0
YOU MONSTER, YOU SAID YOU WOULDN'T POST THOSE!!!

I thought they were just for us. Jeez.  :scared:

---- Pretty much what every girl ever said to their boyfriend

Or, their boyfriend with a Reddit account and a surprising amount of Karma for their level of wit.

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 32963
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5343
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #58 on: March 22, 2017, 11:59:38 PM »
0
Josh was so disgusted with the paint job that he had to wear Conrail-colored gloves just to handle it!

Josh, for a brush-painted the paint job is not bad at all.  It is not typical  :ashat: quality, but not *THAT* bad.  The patch job of the front windows bothers me more than the paint.  :trollface:

I wouldn't brush-paint my models, but if Ed is ok with it, I'm ok too. There are no giant globs or serious paint buildup anywhere.  Ed, what brand of paint did you use?  It goes on smoothly and covers well. How many coats?
« Last Edit: March 23, 2017, 12:05:28 AM by peteski »
. . . 42 . . .

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24747
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9272
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Conrail NW2 9253
« Reply #59 on: March 23, 2017, 12:02:54 AM »
0
Josh, for a brush-painted the paint job is not bad at all.  It is not typical  :ashat: quality, but not *THAT* bad.  The patch job of the front windows bothers me more than the paint. 

It bothers me too! The true amount of work required on it wasn't visible until I got some paint on it though. Now that I do, I'll be taking the sanding sticks to it and making it much better.

I amuses me that that's the biggest problem in my eyes with the thing, and it's taken until now for someone to mention it! lol.