0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
I purchased a couple of Kato Unitrack sections and got a very basic oval track functioning. I then purchased a couple of used track lots from eBay. Some of this used track does not work as well as the new track, the plastic is a lighter color, but more importantly, I have had a few power feed issues.
Hello all after years of thinking about it, I have decided to start my first railroad layout. I purchased a couple of Kato Unitrack sections and got a very basic oval track functioning. I am using a Bachmann EZ Command DCC controller connected to the N Scale Unitrack with a custom adapter. I then purchased a couple of used track lots from eBay. Some of this used track does not work as well as the new track, the plastic is a lighter color, but more importantly, I have had a few power feed issues. My track is still being designed, so very basic track on plywood with a couple of power feeders for 12 track sections. I will be adding more power feeder locations to the final design. I am wondering what I am experiencing with the used track. Do I simply need to replace the “Jointers” or is there a larger issue like older Unitrack was not as good and should not be mixed with new Unitrack. Thanks for the help as I start my design.
I never knew there were copper Unijoiners once upon a time. My first experience with Unitrack was ~2010.
Is it time again to muse about what N scale life would be like if Unitrack had code 55 rail and North American tie spacing?
Isn't Atlas C65 track system made to American tie spacing? Too bad the selection is quite limited. But as you said, if Kato produced such track it would be a winner (at least in USA).
Yes, but I've been told it's the Unijoiner that makes Unitrack so damned reliable both mechanically and electrically. So much so that when Blackstone released their HOn3 track line they worked with Kato to use Unijoiners. As I understand there's nothing special about the joiners used in Atlas True Track. And, of course, as you pointed out the available geometry for the Atlas line is very limited and train set-like.
That is true - Unijoiners are very different than any other track joiner I have worked with. While to me the plastic piece doesn't seem out of the ordinary, the metal part is: it is a very deep joiner (with the bottom much deeper than the base of the track. That makes is relatively springy - that results in a positive pressure at the joiner-to-track area. Unlike regular joiners which will become loose after few connect/disconnect cycles, Unijoiner will retain the positive pressure with the track, even after repeated connect/disconnect cycles. I suspect that is why they are so reliable.