Author Topic: A free-moN version of the WBTR  (Read 25826 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24746
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9272
    • Conrail 1285
Re: A free-moN version of the WBTR
« Reply #150 on: November 01, 2016, 03:21:49 PM »
0
I love that life sized bridge!

wcfn100

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8841
  • Respect: +1221
    • Chicago Great Western Modeler
Re: A free-moN version of the WBTR
« Reply #151 on: November 01, 2016, 03:55:38 PM »
+1
Here is a view of the rough layout of the roads. Two lanes I-694 south, two lanes I-694 north and Soo street ( barely visible ) to the right in the picture.



For anyone who want to play along.




Jason

Bendtracker1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1466
  • Remember The Rock!
  • Respect: +1398
    • The Little Rock Line
Re: A free-moN version of the WBTR
« Reply #152 on: November 01, 2016, 10:00:58 PM »
0
Wyatt that will become a signature scene for sure!

Rossford Yard

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1172
  • Respect: +145
Re: A free-moN version of the WBTR
« Reply #153 on: November 03, 2016, 08:49:09 AM »
0
Looking good, glad to see you back in the MRR scene!

Will be a signature scene for sure. On both the proto and your model, it looks like a truck with overinflated tires could catch the bottom of that bridge, of course, leading me to think you could add a humorous twist to the scene by ripping off the top of the semi......but maybe that's just me.

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11675
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +6802
Re: A free-moN version of the WBTR
« Reply #154 on: November 03, 2016, 03:17:35 PM »
0
On both the proto and your model, it looks like a truck with overinflated tires could catch the bottom of that bridge, of course, leading me to think you could add a humorous twist to the scene by ripping off the top of the semi......but maybe that's just me.

In the prototype picture, it's forced perspective making it appear as close clearance.  But, look at the truck on the right.  It will clear with a lot of room to spare.  The truck on the left is just a lot closer to the camera than the bridge.

DFF

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!

milw12

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 374
  • Respect: +333
Re: A free-moN version of the WBTR
« Reply #155 on: November 03, 2016, 09:30:13 PM »
0
Since I can't say it better myself:

I love that life sized bridge!

What struck me first is that how much like an actual bridge it already looks like. Something about how everyday and normal it looks combined with the size really struck a chord, it's not something that is modeled too often.

Might have to go for a drive and check out the real thing soon, I know I've driven under that bridge plenty  :D

James Costello

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1833
  • Respect: +337
Re: A free-moN version of the WBTR
« Reply #156 on: November 03, 2016, 10:16:46 PM »
0
The bridge scene is going to be great.

Might be some good references here - Jamie's scene was also going to be great:
http://csxdixieline.blogspot.com.au/2010/03/howto-build-modern-highway.html
James Costello
Espee into the 90's

Rossford Yard

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1172
  • Respect: +145
Re: A free-moN version of the WBTR
« Reply #157 on: November 04, 2016, 10:04:55 AM »
0
In the prototype picture, it's forced perspective making it appear as close clearance.  But, look at the truck on the right.  It will clear with a lot of room to spare.  The truck on the left is just a lot closer to the camera than the bridge.

DFF

It's closer by a bit, but also has a higher cab and trailer vs flatbed loaded with lumber, which is also higher.

I understand it would be a colossal engineering failure to build that bridge too low, but also suspect it was built a while ago, and there has been a push to get trucks bigger, to just fit normal clearances.  Kudos to Wyatt for the overall feel being just right.  That 2" foam is about 26 N scale feet above the other road, and about 17, which is normal clearance, to the bottom of the structure.  Makes me want to use Wyatt's leftover 2" foam sheet to create similar grade on my new pike, hint, Wyatt, hint.

soo

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 637
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +107
Re: A free-moN version of the WBTR
« Reply #158 on: November 04, 2016, 10:40:32 AM »
0
Thanks for all the kind words guys!!!

I have the railings that I need to soak in bestine so I can put those on. I plan on making the bridge pilings out of basswood. Here are some sample/test shots.





I know these are not the best,, just something I threw together. I used 3/16" and 1/4" square basswood. I need to noodle on a way to make them square, straight and plumb. Some of the pilings also have a bottom piece that spans the gap from column to column.



After seeing the mock ups,, with the proto pic,,, looks like mine are a wee bit small.

Jeff.. I would have to charge a transportation fee.

Cya, Y-it

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11675
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +6802
Re: A free-moN version of the WBTR
« Reply #159 on: November 04, 2016, 02:22:05 PM »
+1
I would try to talk you into using square styrene tubing to make those piers.  That's what I did to scratchbuild the abutments and piers on my highway bridges.

DFF

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!

soo

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 637
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +107
Re: A free-moN version of the WBTR
« Reply #160 on: November 09, 2016, 12:45:31 AM »
+1
Well there has been more progress.

I was able to get all the track laid for the Cardigan Jct section, sure does look purdy!!




After making sure I had all the blank tie spaces filled in, I was able to move on with the wiring,, complete!! Well sort of,, no loconet cabling yet or the accessory buss. But I will get that done.


I wired up the slide switches also, plus the heat shrink tubing.


Here is a shot of the ground throw. I am thinking about using the upright wire to make targets.


I was able to run a short train to test the wiring.
Not a valid youtube URL

Well there ya have it,, progress. The bridge scene will be next,,maybe,lol

C-ya, Y-it

soo

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 637
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +107
Re: A free-moN version of the WBTR
« Reply #161 on: November 18, 2016, 08:23:29 AM »
+3
Just a little update,, installed the railings on the bridge,, which is also painted with Rust-Oleum primer for rusty metal.







That is all, you may return to your regular scheduled programming.

C-ya,
Y-it

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24746
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9272
    • Conrail 1285
Re: A free-moN version of the WBTR
« Reply #162 on: November 18, 2016, 10:21:48 AM »
0
Continue to love it.

« Last Edit: November 18, 2016, 10:28:20 AM by Ed Kapuscinski »

mstl 246

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 60
  • Respect: +12
Re: A free-moN version of the WBTR
« Reply #163 on: November 19, 2016, 08:58:59 PM »
0
Great progress on a key scene Wyatt, the bridge will be easily recognizable to people familiar with the area.

Nat

Pesto

  • Posts: 13
  • Respect: 0
Re: A free-moN version of the WBTR
« Reply #164 on: November 21, 2016, 12:27:39 AM »
0
Really enjoying your progress vicariously here, this is going to be great!

Good innovation to use .040 styrene for the slide switch ground throws on foam, I had been puzzling for a way to do that myself.