0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Even though I want it, will still have to wait after the initial rush. I'll let the big ballers be the testers. See if it turns out like the infamous berk. Hanging back and see if I can acquire one later for a reasonable (or least less inflated) price. I will only stretch so far to pay for the dcc bells & whistles I dont even plan to use.
Ah, the good old Minitrix! Not half bad looking weathered.
Another possibility — the Berk didn't sell as well as expected, so more of the tooling cost for the K4 is being amortized in the first release.I've suspected from the beginning that Bachmann is beginning to load more of the tooling/development costs in the first release of their recent models. It makes little sense to have such high MSRPs if not trying to pay off the tooling quickly.
Agreed. I think the single biggest improvement, visually, of the Bachmann release is the valve gear; otherwise, I've always felt the Trix loco did a fine job of capturing the "feel" of the K4...Mark in Oregon
Do we know for certain that the Berk sales were disappointing? I notice there is still quite a bit of inventory at MB Klein, so they clearly haven't sold out, but I have no idea if the sales overall were good, fair or bad.One would hope that if the Berk sales were disappointing, Bachmann would learn from this. You can't charge $230 (street price) for a locomotive that has basic performance issues. I know there are some folks that are very happy with their Berks. But I also know that many have issues, and I had three all with the same problems to one degree or another, so I don't think I just got a bad sample (I'd suspect just the opposite: folks that got a good one were lucky). But what I don't know is if someone at Bachmann internalized all this for future reference ("Gee guys, we whiffed big time on the Berk; let's not let THAT happen again . . .")John C.
Does the fact that there was already an N scale Berk out there play into this at all?