0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
The left coast is the best coast.
At least until it falls into the ocean... another report from a couple days ago on CBS claimed a fault above the San Andreas along the northern California coast could lead to more destruction than predicted for the San Andreas.
Actually I think you're referring to the subduction zone issue from CA to BC. There is a lot out on it, but it'sa recently discovered, recurring problem that will probably oblitherate the entire PNW within the next 50-100 years.I think the "good" scenario is a 8.7, the "bad" one is 9.1 and a tsunami that will destroy both the US and Canadian pacific coastlines, as well as most of Japan.Apparently it happens every 250 years and is way overdue.Check it out, it is an amazing bit of detective work in even uncovering this, combining geology and putting together stories from Japan and Canadian Indians from the 17th Century.
The article is in the New Yorker.
While we're guessing wildly, I'd like a new 0-6-0. Something designed for DCC and lights.
The summaries of the NW earthquake article I've seen in the NW media indicate that, while somewhat sensationalized, the basic facts are correct. The biggest danger, outside the west side cities, is tsunamis. East of the Cascades it will just be a serious quake, not the end of the world, and east of the Coast Ranges the danger will be mainly to cities and infrastructure. In one of the Puget Sound cities, or Portland, things could be pretty bad. Seattle in particular has a lot of development on fill, making "liquefaction" one of the major concerns.