0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Um, because criminal law doesn't work that way? If the State of Pennsylvania thinks they have enough to charge the man for something (and of course they have to say they're "considering" it -- it's blatantly obvious that it's POSSIBLE that the man committed a criminal act, it would be irresponsible for them to not at least 'consider' it)
I hate adding to useless speculation, and fueling the flames of this stuff.But... I do remember, while in philly a few weeks ago with the Goon Squad, we heard Amtrak talking to the police about people rocking trains from abandoned buildings in the area, so it's not a new phenomenon.
The Railwire is not your personal army.
Dave, Do you really believe that? So if the engineer says "I don't remember what happened" Amtrak is going to say OK and put his name back on the call roster. If Amtrak is taking full responsibility, why is Philadelphia considering charging the engineer and not charging Amtrak? I read the Amtrak statement as Public Relations speak, how many people do you think right now are debating their ridership on Amtrak? Let me ask you this simple question, if the engineer felt safe in his position why did he get a lawyer? Here is a guy that grew up with an interest in trains and instead of going straight to his employer to fill out an accident report, he contacted his lawyer for advice. Makes you wonder why, just saying.
Is there an audio recording on trains, or just a data black box?
Here is a cab view. Red level is the brake, the black lever on the left is the throttle.