0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.
Now that is cool.
Not my idea...I just copied a Lance Mindheim experiment on his Miami Spur blog (the URL link is down unfortunately but the set up is straight forward). You hook up a stand-alone DCC sound decoder to track power at the input end and to an audio transformer and a wireless FM radio transmitter like this one at the output: http://www.dx.com/p/5-in-1-wireless-fm-radio-headset-with-transmitter-base-station-remote-monitoring-48500#.VU4x5_lVhBcYou then program the stationary decoder with the same address as the loco you wish to run...both decoders get the speed and sound commands but only the mobile decoder can respond to the speed/direction/light commands, and thus control the loco on the layout, and only the stationary decoder can respond to the sound commands and thus drive the FM transmitter which feeds the sound signal to the headset. I reported on an earlier experiment in a TRW Weekend Update about a year or so ago but I was using a Tsunami decoder at the time as it was the only decoder which had the right FM prime mover sound. The results with the Tsunami were really poor and we abandoned the experiment. When we did the first ESU Loksound installs into locomotives about a month ago the sound quality was soooo much better I decided to repeat the experiment with a Loksound unit. And as luck would have it ESU released the correct FM prime mover sound about a month ago. Yes the sound is a if you are in the cab. In the C&W application this sound approach is used *only* in the isolated Slocan/Kaslo job which has a single dedicated loco and where the engineer is physically isolated from the rest of the session for 95% of it. So the approach seems to make sense and of the three operators who have tried it, 2.5 loved it. (One person loved the sound but doesn't like wearing head phones of any sort.)We are thinking of experimenting with this same approach for the Kraft switcher job, the last remaining job which has no sound units. This job *does* interact with other operators frequently but the headphones don't prevent you from hearing people talking around you. They just provide a very realistic set of locomotive sounds over top of other room noise.md
So, does the Loco have a sound decoder in it also???Rick
Went to the Air Force Museum in Dayton. The most surprising plane was this thing. Had no idea any survived the war.
......somewhere between twelve and fifteen of the Baka exist (too lazy to GOOGLE it, now), most of them are the operational models. Some of the remaining are examples that Japan did build, but never used. Most are the opertaional models. There was only one version of this thing that ever was operational. Someone actually did an extensive study of these things. I did read it, but I forget where I ran across it.
Nope, no need. Just a conventional decoder.Md
If there's some way to make the sound decoder mobile, you could have better sound using a larger speaker transported by the engineer rather than the loco (perhaps a big bling speaker necklace or a beer hat renegineered for audio purposes). It could transmit into the space or, with a headphone jack like a conventional audio component, be engineer only.The neat thing at that stage to do is also tie in audio broadcast for operators to communicate to each other through the same system.Next step, stationary audio transmitters that bring in sounds of the locale, such as rushing water for a river, which fades in and out depending on proximity. Or bring in train sounds (not engine) that are specific to a locale, like wheel squeal on a sharp curve, introduced via location-based train sensors entering and leaving a quadrant.
Not my idea...I just copied a Lance Mindheim experiment on his Miami Spur blog (the URL link is down unfortunately but the set up is straight forward). You hook up a stand-alone DCC sound decoder to track power at the input end and to an audio transformer and a wireless FM radio transmitter like this one at the output: http://www.dx.com/p/5-in-1-wireless-fm-radio-headset-with-transmitter-base-station-remote-monitoring-48500#.VU4x5_lVhBc
Mark,This is very intriguing and I would like some additional info. You said to hook up the output of the stationary sound decoder to an audio transformer. What would the input and output impedances of this transformer be? Do you have a link to an example? Obviously, the transformer output impedance would have to be compatible with the FM "base station". Would you be able to run multiple locos with this setup and just select the loco you want to listen to? So many questions.......Doug