0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
That is weird to see this type of problem in the 21st Century. But then again, these things are made in a country where cutting corners and minimizing cost is the top priority.
Remember, it's still a casting, an ancient, imperfect process. An N loco frame is not going to be magnafluxed or otherwise pre-tested because its strength is not critical nor does anyone (read: most Americans) want to pay more for the process. It's cheap enough just to replace the few defective ones that pass through the building process. Peteski, Chinese manufacturing responds to its biggest customer, the US, which generally means making the cheapest product. All those Wal-Marts and Harbor Freights exist for a reason. And on the contrary, Atlas, for one, is made in China and I don't see any overall quality problems there.I hear people moaning about US industry no longer able to recreate the one-piece cast frames used for big steam locomotives -- "lost technological ability". Well, who would want something like that nowadays with its high weight and limited flexibility? A cracked frame was not uncommon and they're still finding frame defects when steam locos are being restored. Modern welding fixes that. Now restoration generally means using original parts. But for practical purposes in operating steam locos today, it would be better, for example, to change to modern alloys for steam pipes and to replace friction bearings with roller bearings. So in N, I look forward to something better than the current split cast frames. But whatever it is, it will cost more than a split frame.
Has IM addressed the issue for the new release?