Author Topic: Looking for some thoughts...  (Read 2698 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

wazzou

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6729
  • #GoCougs
  • Respect: +1655
Re: Looking for some thoughts...
« Reply #15 on: January 16, 2015, 12:06:17 PM »
0
The other things I notice is that some of the yard turnouts and crossovers look rather sharp as drawn, and the reach-in depth seems long in some places.  The grade from the yard to the branch line may turn out to be rather steep, if it has to clear the double main and avoid the 'convenient cliff' scenery.

Ed


That was my thought too.  I don't see how the ladder as drawn at left will fit in that space.
Bryan

Member of NPRHA, Modeling Committee Member
http://www.nprha.org/
Member of MRHA


Leggy

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 663
  • Respect: +48
Re: Looking for some thoughts...
« Reply #16 on: January 16, 2015, 06:37:41 PM »
0
Neither do I honestly, anyone with some form of track planning software able to turn this from dodgy MS Paint drawing to actually to scale track plan?

Leggy

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 663
  • Respect: +48
Re: Looking for some thoughts...
« Reply #17 on: January 17, 2015, 09:54:25 PM »
0


Well I thought I'd show my ideas for the staging and it's access. Also named everything.
« Last Edit: January 18, 2015, 01:53:59 AM by Leggy »

bdennis

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 557
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +172
    • Delaware & Hudson Champlain Division
Re: Looking for some thoughts...
« Reply #18 on: January 18, 2015, 06:22:20 PM »
0
Leggy,
Looking good.

Can I suggest that you invest in a copy of AnyRail and draw it up. I think the turnouts look to compressed and Anyrail will help in that area.
Also how will you manage the turnouts? Will they be driven via Tortoise? If so, watch for clearance on the below hidden track.. That may drive your decission re healix or not.

With the plan you have I would be concerned about access / maintance of the turnouts on the lower section.. So clearance would be key there..

Keep the updates coming.
Brendan Dennis
N scale - Delaware & Hudson Champlain Division

M.C. Fujiwara

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1344
  • I'm my own personal train-er.
  • Respect: +84
Re: Looking for some thoughts...
« Reply #19 on: January 18, 2015, 09:16:32 PM »
0
Your plan is do-able, with the key considerations being train length and turnout type (scratch-built or store-bought).
Here's a rendering of your idea with many scratch-built curved turnouts:



Design uses 6-inch squares.
Dark Grey is C55 ME concrete, red is C55 Atlas wooden.
Mainline doubletrack is on 1.25" centers with crossovers of #10 turnouts.
Yard & branch have min. #7 straight and many #8 36"/24" curved turnouts.
Visible mainline has 20" and 18.75" curves, while hidden dials down to between 12"-15" (which you can expand if you want benchwork to come out more into the room--I just wanted to show "minimals").

I basically just rendered what you sketched out, where you sketched it out, so if you want to expand the yard you could start the yard lead and the yard ladder about 18" earlier.

You've already thought about helices, so I thought I'd show what a "no-lix"ish design would look like:



By having the mains descend on long ramps of 2% grade, you could wrap back around and have a yard about 9" railhead-to-railhead (minus ply/foam would leave about 7" of space, plus "access holes" just in case you need to reach ramps.
(Like bdennis said, you need to take into consideration switch machines and anything else that protrudes down).

If you do go with helices, then I recommend designing so the yard tracks & turnouts are as close to you as possible.

I also included a programming track and two different locations for stub-end storage / staging for your mine loads.

Here's a list of all the turnouts I used in the design (last number being the quantity):

R10R40-30, N Fast Tracks R10R40-30 Right curved turnout 5.71º    4
R8L24-18, N Fast Tracks R8L24-18 Left curved turnout 7.13º           1
R8L30-20, N Fast Tracks R8L30-20 Left curved turnout 7.13º           2
R8L36-24, N Fast Tracks R8L36-24 Left curved turnout 7.13º           3
R8R30-20, N Fast Tracks R8R30-20 Right curved turnout 7.13º           2
R8R36-24, N Fast Tracks R8R36-24 Right curved turnout 7.13º           6
T10L, N Fast Tracks T10L Left turnout 6 13/16".                                   5
T10R, N Fast Tracks T10R Right turnout 6 13/16".                             3
T7L, N Fast Tracks T7L Left turnout 5 7/16".                                           4
T7R, N Fast Tracks T7R Right turnout 5 7/16".                                   12
T8L, N Fast Tracks T8L Left turnout 5 15/16".                                           1
T8R, N Fast Tracks T8R Right turnout 5 15/16".                                 2
Y8, N Fast Tracks Y8 Wye turnout 5 15/16".                                           5

That said, I did this rather quickly as an approximation.
If I were to build this layout, I'd lay out the trackage for the mains, yards, etc., and then use tracing paper to make turnout templates (or use Fast Tracks templates that are "close enough") and build multiple-turnout fixtures that ensure smooth flowing curves.
Especially as you like big modern diesels :)

Narrowest point is still 30" so you need to be wary of layout height: both reach to back of branch line on top as well as to any trackage underneath.
The plan supports trains 5'-7' long (though through trains can be long as you'd like!).

Anyway, hope this helps give you some ideas for your space.
Cheers!
M.C. Fujiwara
Silicon Valley Free-moN
http://sv-free-mon.org/

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24747
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9272
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Looking for some thoughts...
« Reply #20 on: January 19, 2015, 12:58:49 PM »
0
Your crossovers are backwards. You want to be able to get into and out of the yard. The way you've got them, you can't do that.

M.C. Fujiwara

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1344
  • I'm my own personal train-er.
  • Respect: +84
Re: Looking for some thoughts...
« Reply #21 on: January 19, 2015, 01:14:59 PM »
0
Your crossovers are backwards. You want to be able to get into and out of the yard. The way you've got them, you can't do that.

Just following his original drawing.
Not quite sure what he's got in mind for running / ops.
But yes, flipping the crossovers would allow both mains to access the yard.

I'd also put another crossover from the "inner" main to the first yard track immediately after the ladder, which would allow shorter trains to double dip on the A/D track.
Much depends on length of trains in operation.
M.C. Fujiwara
Silicon Valley Free-moN
http://sv-free-mon.org/