Author Topic: CSX Hanover Subdivision  (Read 143322 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3606
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #585 on: February 10, 2018, 07:45:30 PM »
0
I would think OSHA and its state sister would have mandated lighting in the stairwells too, at least at the egress points. It's hard to tell from your pick, but it looks like there are boxes located up the stairwell and over the doors, not sure if these are lights, vents, or something else.

Yes, there are lights going up the stairwell, mostly on the left hand side going up, and then one at very bottom and very top.  Not sure I can light those or not. 

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3606
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #586 on: February 10, 2018, 07:48:44 PM »
0
I ordered a Shapeways car the other week, seen here



It's not quite what is on the rock runner that runs out of Bittinger, so I contacted the designer and sent along a video of the Rock Runner passing thru St Denis, MD, asking if the cars were something he could design.  Well, I think I'm going to have to save some money now.

https://www.shapeways.com/product/K2ZRWZ72Z/h9-aggregate-hopper-csx-n-1-160

https://www.shapeways.com/product/45SPRMBSD/modern-aggregate-hopper-csx-n-1-160

One I think is a new design that he did, while the other he said he had drawn up but Shapeways rejected it due to the railings being too thin or something.  So he went back and redid some things on the car.

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3606
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #587 on: February 18, 2018, 07:56:39 PM »
0
Winchester & Western #2197 makes an appearance in CSX Hagerstown Yard. 



I realized after the fact that this ( along with sister unit GMTX 2182 ) were missing the air filter box ahead of where the DB housing would be.  On this unit, the fix was simple.  Shave off roof detail and cut a piece of styrene to fit the area.  2182 is a different animal as it has dynamic brakes.  I think what I'm going to do there is cut the DB/Air filter section off of a donor shell if I can find one and then do a complete replacement on that unit, as it's already painted and decaled  :facepalm: :facepalm:

wazzou

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6729
  • #GoCougs
  • Respect: +1655
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #588 on: February 18, 2018, 10:40:01 PM »
0
What about windshield and side glass?
Bryan

Member of NPRHA, Modeling Committee Member
http://www.nprha.org/
Member of MRHA


mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3606
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #589 on: February 18, 2018, 10:46:37 PM »
0
What about windshield and side glass?

I still have to put sill stripe on other side, clear coat, and subtle weathering.  The decal sheet I got had 2 of same sill stripe, but each side is reversed from the other.  Someone pointed it out to company (CMR) but only after some sets were sold.  I contacted them and they are sending a reprint of the stripes.  After that's done, then I'll get the glass back in there  :D  Also have grabs to install yet.

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3606
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #590 on: February 20, 2018, 09:31:36 PM »
+1
Update on the Challenge build :  Check out all the entries here if you haven't been following : https://www.therailwire.net/forum/index.php?board=43.0

Drilled holes for LEDs, fun part now with wiring.


Took LEDs out, and outside in the brief spring preview and shot a coat of primer.  Will get a coat of tan tomorrow.


« Last Edit: February 20, 2018, 10:08:54 PM by mu26aeh »

jpec

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 855
  • Gender: Male
  • Perception and reality engage in a daily civil war
  • Respect: +172
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #591 on: February 20, 2018, 11:29:57 PM »
0
Man...I hope my son doesn't see these.  Thank goodness he isn't on the railwi....oh, crap, he is...

JP
"trees are non-judgmental, and they won't abuse or betray you."- DKS

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3606
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #592 on: February 28, 2018, 09:00:07 PM »
0
I acquired a 3rd MMID unit today.  So now it's either trade for 301 if someone is missing 302, renumbered the 2nd 302 to 301 (or 3,4,5, or 6) or renumber to G&W 2060 heritage unit.



mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3606
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #593 on: March 04, 2018, 05:12:56 PM »
0
My replacement stripes came in the mail yesterday, so I was able to finish up decaling the Winchester & Western units last night.








DeltaBravo

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 640
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +208
    • N-Scale and other interest
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #594 on: March 04, 2018, 09:04:32 PM »
0
Looking good Adam.
David B.
 
Member WMRHS

https://undara.wordpress.com/


coosvalley

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1405
  • Respect: +640
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #595 on: March 06, 2018, 08:05:23 AM »
0
My replacement stripes came in the mail yesterday, so I was able to finish up decaling the Winchester & Western units last night.









Looking good, but I have a question for you, why did you not just put the frame stripes on upside down to get them to have the "lean" in the right direction?.Not face down, but flip the bottom edge for the top edge..

Nevermind, I figured it out :facepalm:
« Last Edit: March 06, 2018, 08:43:53 AM by coosvalley »

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3606
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #596 on: March 06, 2018, 07:00:25 PM »
0
Looking good, but I have a question for you, why did you not just put the frame stripes on upside down to get them to have the "lean" in the right direction?.Not face down, but flip the bottom edge for the top edge..

Nevermind, I figured it out :facepalm:

Believe me, I tried every way but wrong to figure out the original decals.  I even went back and checked the proof on their website.  That's when I noticed the sheet I had had 2 identical stripes, instead of one in each direction as was on the website.  That's when I noticed the web was different and contacted them.  They said they had a few others report the problem, and fixed the website.  I must have gotten an old proof. 

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3606
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #597 on: March 16, 2018, 06:01:31 PM »
+4
Pretty much have the lime loadout finished up, build wise.  Still have to finish running wiring for lighting and some more weathering/rust.  This was for the Industrial Building challenge.  If you haven't checked out the entries, go here https://www.therailwire.net/forum/index.php?board=43.0  And to vote, go here https://www.therailwire.net/forum/index.php?topic=44226.0 (if seen before March 19th)  Next up will be replacing the Walthers Glacier Gravel with the stone loadout that is located at Bittinger as well.






mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5382
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3606
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #598 on: March 25, 2018, 08:26:58 PM »
0
Been doing some thinking on the layout lately and one thing that bothers me is not having Center St modeled.  This is where 795 originates and 797 terminates.  Smiths would also be nice as that's where the interchange with YorkRail is, but I can use the expanded siding at Porters that I redid last year for that purpose.  I visited a double deck layout over the weekend and that got me thinking about a helix and doubling mine to add some run and more space for more features !  I give you my doodles from this evening.  These are just quick what if's and I definitely need to gather my local work crew to determine if this is feasible or not.  AgCom, Utz and Bittinger would get moved to the top level.  Sunoco, would get moved towards the helix area, and I would presumably being at add Center St and Smiths to the lower level.  Everything from Porters east would remain as is.  Up top, come out of helix, hit Utz, around the curve to New and Old siding into the wye at Bittinger.  Mainline continues west (180 around the center divide to head back to helix) and find new sidings for Morton Buildings and Dal-Tile, and new location for AgCom before the helix.  Descend the helix and come out into Security, which everything west would remain as is.  As drawn, I think I'd have to have a crossover at top or bottom of helix to get the mainline onto the correct side of the divide, or flip the top level industries, leaving Bittinger where it is.   




« Last Edit: March 25, 2018, 08:29:24 PM by mu26aeh »

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24745
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9272
    • Conrail 1285
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #599 on: March 26, 2018, 05:05:37 PM »
+1
No moss grows on a rolling Adam.

I like the way you're continuing to refine the layout.