Author Topic: CSX Hanover Subdivision  (Read 143399 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

basementcalling

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3543
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +751
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #435 on: February 06, 2017, 12:50:18 PM »
+1
My layout height is only 42" or thereabouts, so I have a little more leeway with the reach police.  But your idea of access on both sides is something else I will have to look into .

I was thinking more of the visual impact than reach in actually, but even at 42 inches human armpits are usually closer than we think to impacting delicate details.
Peter Pfotenhauer

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24750
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9275
    • Conrail 1285
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #436 on: February 06, 2017, 01:29:32 PM »
+1
Adam: I admire how you have no hesitation to uproot what you have to make things fit your scheme or remedy flaws. Not only that, you have things back in operation  in just a few days.

Quoted for truth. Adam is quite the Agile Model Railroading practitioner!

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5385
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3607
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #437 on: February 06, 2017, 06:53:08 PM »
0
Adam: I admire how you have no hesitation to uproot what you have to make things fit your scheme or remedy flaws. Not only that, you have things back in operation  in just a few days.

Hey, what can I say ?  Have freight to move and can't do that without having the lines connected  :D

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5385
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3607
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #438 on: February 07, 2017, 09:14:29 PM »
0
The gentleman over on NSN did version 2.0 for the mill area.  Might be on to something :)  This was expanded to 27" wide.

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24750
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9275
    • Conrail 1285
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #439 on: February 07, 2017, 09:57:41 PM »
0
I like it. I was concerned about the reach distance on the sidings in the back, but at least the one on the left can be reached from the end.

Have you mocked it up in person yet?

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5385
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3607
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #440 on: February 07, 2017, 10:02:04 PM »
0
No, I'm not that fast  :D  he just posted it tonight.  I've been helping my dad on a tearout job as he is replacing a floor with new hardwood last couple nights so I haven't had time to cut lumber for the extension.  I have a meeting at 3 Wednesday afternoon, hoping my dad won't need me tomorrow and I can come home and get extension together.  I think I have enough flex laying around I can get an idea of it but will probably have to go pick some up again  :facepalm:

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5385
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3607
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #441 on: February 10, 2017, 08:27:20 PM »
0
Paper mill expansion has begun !

16716236_10209522539674003_7952076062408757715_o by Adam Henry, on Flickr

Once spackling dries, I will lay out/mock up new track arrangements.

wm3798

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 16128
  • Gender: Male
  • I like models. She likes antiques. Perfect!
  • Respect: +6470
    • Western Maryland Railway Western Lines
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #442 on: February 11, 2017, 11:13:49 AM »
0
I see you have the opportunity to model "Warm Springs" back there in the corner... :)
Rockin' It Old School

Lee Weldon www.wmrywesternlines.net

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5385
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3607
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #443 on: February 11, 2017, 11:44:14 AM »
0
I may include the bridge scene at Gladfelter there, so we could tap the heat.  It is hooked into the geothermal  :D

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5385
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3607
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #444 on: February 11, 2017, 10:35:11 PM »
0
Here is very rough set up.  Just when i thought I had enough turnouts to replace all my Atlas ones, I go and make the layout bigger and I need more  :facepalm:  I just put some structures in there for spot holders for now so it didn't look so bare.  A lot of scratchbuild/kitbash to go on here.

20170211_221508 by Adam Henry, on Flickr

Here's the area I'm going after.  Look around if you like

https://www.google.com/maps/@39.8713822,-76.865171,3a,75y,188.84h,86.2t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1scqSIJHmkml4HSN2yNGvFCw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

SSW7771

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 267
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +97
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #445 on: February 11, 2017, 11:09:23 PM »
0
This is coming together nicely. I am enjoying following along.
Marshall

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5385
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3607
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #446 on: February 12, 2017, 08:13:14 PM »
0
Today was full bore on the paper mill.  I was able to get the return loop in but that will result in a second reverse loop.  I need some help on how to block/wire these off.  First up an overall shot, then from right to left, starting at the end of wye where the old reversing section started with tracks gapped at the wye switch.

20170212_194706 by Adam Henry, on Flickr

20170212_194344 by Adam Henry, on Flickr

20170212_194419 by Adam Henry, on Flickr

20170212_194423 by Adam Henry, on Flickr

20170212_194429 by Adam Henry, on Flickr

20170212_194435 by Adam Henry, on Flickr


jpec

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 855
  • Gender: Male
  • Perception and reality engage in a daily civil war
  • Respect: +172
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #447 on: February 12, 2017, 08:26:12 PM »
0
This is cool. I liked the original unconnected version but if it gives you more bang for the buck running wise then it's all good.

Jeff
"trees are non-judgmental, and they won't abuse or betray you."- DKS

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24750
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9275
    • Conrail 1285
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #448 on: February 13, 2017, 01:34:38 PM »
+1
I like the presence of the town too, because that's very much Spring Grove.

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5385
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3607
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #449 on: February 13, 2017, 09:51:48 PM »
0