Author Topic: SD40-2 High Hood  (Read 3900 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

milw156

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 593
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +239
    • Modutrak
Re: SD40-2 High Hood
« Reply #15 on: August 11, 2014, 08:19:28 PM »
0
Just noticed that the MILW and SOO has the proper reduced fuel tanks!
Watch your wallet Wyatt


The HO Milw unit shows dropsteps and chains at each end of the unit, which is not correct for Milw SD40-2's, not sure about the Soo ('cept for the ones they got from Milw) Fixing that will be a lot easier than chopping the tanks to the correct length.  Not sure why they decided to use the last paintscheme rather than the middle "bilboard sceme. Yup, this could be painful to Mr wallet! Might even have to get a Soo and paint it out  & re stencil it MILWUAKEE !!!!!
Rick
« Last Edit: August 11, 2014, 08:26:20 PM by milw156 »

asarge

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1675
  • Respect: +25
Re: SD40-2 High Hood
« Reply #16 on: August 11, 2014, 08:23:20 PM »
0
Quote
Nutz! Here I am, modeling 1971, and my favorite loco - the SD40-2 - didn't come out until 1972.

I just CAN'T change to 1972 or later, because then I'd have to sell most of my many 40' steel ice reefers. Boy, I'd love to have those 4 Southern high hoods... sigh.

Rule 1 always applies Kiz.  :D

packers#1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1483
  • Gender: Male
  • Modern Shortline Modeler
  • Respect: +565
Re: SD40-2 High Hood
« Reply #17 on: August 11, 2014, 09:29:05 PM »
0
Somehow, I can't picture a couple of Southern SD40-2s hauling 50 Intermountain ice reefers. I'm getting dizzy...
So don't assign them to a train of ice reefers and assign them to whatever kind of freights the Southern would normally have assigned them to instead. One year won't be too much of a quibble in terms of most building details etc, just the roster bits like the ice reefers.

EDIT: Also, the post above; I'm sure there's an Ed's Law photo out there somewhere anyways  :trollface:  :tommann:  :ashat:
Sawyer Berry
Clemson University graduate, c/o 2018
American manufacturing isn’t dead, it’s just gotten high tech

u18b

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3709
  • Respect: +1955
    • My website
Re: SD40-2 High Hood
« Reply #18 on: August 12, 2014, 11:23:47 AM »
0
Interesting that we now have reservations on not one, but three runs..... and none have appeared yet.

I guess they are relying on the reception of the Canadian versions.

Hope these are great.

« Last Edit: August 12, 2014, 11:52:51 AM by u18b »
Ron Bearden
CSX N scale Archivist
http://u18b.com

"All get what they want-- not all like what they get."  Aslan the Lion in the Chronicles of Narnia by C.S.Lewis.

Dave Schneider

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2377
  • Respect: +51
Re: SD40-2 High Hood
« Reply #19 on: August 12, 2014, 05:56:47 PM »
0
The HO Milw unit shows dropsteps and chains at each end of the unit, which is not correct for Milw SD40-2's, not sure about the Soo ('cept for the ones they got from Milw) Fixing that will be a lot easier than chopping the tanks to the correct length.  Not sure why they decided to use the last paintscheme rather than the middle "bilboard sceme. Yup, this could be painful to Mr wallet! Might even have to get a Soo and paint it out  & re stencil it MILWUAKEE !!!!!
Rick

I assume that the photos are of HO units, so are we sure that they will be doing a short fuel tank version? I kinda have my doubts about this, but would be pleased to be wrong (wouldn't be the first time). It would also be great if manufacturers would produce non-chain end rails for those road that didn't use them.  I don't think that the Milwaukee had any units with end chains and drop steps.

Best wishes, Dave
If you lend someone $20, and never see that person again, it was probably worth it.

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24752
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9276
    • Conrail 1285
Re: SD40-2 High Hood
« Reply #20 on: August 13, 2014, 03:11:25 PM »
0
Interesting that we now have reservations on not one, but three runs..... and none have appeared yet.

Yep, I'm not reserving ***** until I actually see them.


Scottl

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4852
  • Respect: +1523
Re: SD40-2 High Hood
« Reply #21 on: August 13, 2014, 03:43:34 PM »
0
Just no complaints if they are good and your favorite road name is sold out, or not produced due to lack of interest.  IM just cancelled a whack of freight cars presumably due to limited interest.

JSL

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 439
  • Gender: Male
  • In the Heart Of BNSF Country
  • Respect: +4
    • In the Heart Of BNSF Country
Re: SD40-2 High Hood
« Reply #22 on: August 13, 2014, 04:09:22 PM »
0
Only Milwaukee units with chains and drop steps were the U30C built to BN specs for joint coal service from Colstrip Montana to Portage Wisconsin. I wish they did the bill board scheme! I will get some Milw and Soo ones.

lock4244

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4346
  • Respect: +662
    • My train pics
Re: SD40-2 High Hood
« Reply #23 on: August 13, 2014, 04:21:04 PM »
0
Yep, I'm not reserving ***** until I actually see them.

 :facepalm:


Conm'on Ed, live a little... I reserved one of these ffs.

High Hood

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 507
  • Respect: +129
Re: SD40-2 High Hood
« Reply #24 on: August 13, 2014, 05:02:34 PM »
0
Norfolk and Western pleeeease IM! :D

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24752
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9276
    • Conrail 1285
Re: SD40-2 High Hood
« Reply #25 on: August 13, 2014, 05:56:49 PM »
0
Just no complaints if they are good and your favorite road name is sold out, or not produced due to lack of interest.  IM just cancelled a whack of freight cars presumably due to limited interest.

I'm not wagering my money with their track record on SDs.

If they don't realize that they have to actually deliver product with an unproven reputation, then you know what, they don't get my money.

:facepalm:
Conm'on Ed, live a little... I reserved one of these ffs.

I can make all sorts of pretty drawings too, but that doesn't mean they're going to deliver. I mean, that's not even a drawing of a model. It's a prototype drawing.

I'm not saying they're going to be bad, I'm just saying, that my judgement and dollars will be reserved until I actually see one (or at least trustworthy photos of one).

lock4244

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4346
  • Respect: +662
    • My train pics
Re: SD40-2 High Hood
« Reply #26 on: August 13, 2014, 06:45:44 PM »
0
Ed, I think you're basing your opinion on the tunnel motors. The SD40-2W was a major improvement over the TM's (I have examples of both). Not Kato to be sure, but right up there with Atlas, only road specific... which is better IMO. You seen my SD40-2W shots :)

I do understand the desire NOT to risk capital before seeing the final product... I just haven't your will power  ;)
« Last Edit: August 13, 2014, 06:49:19 PM by lock4244 »

Robbman

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3007
  • Respect: +18
Re: SD40-2 High Hood
« Reply #27 on: August 14, 2014, 09:32:16 PM »
0
Exhaust hatch is right against dustbin hatch in the drawing too :facepalm: