0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.
Nothing for me. But I'm limited in what MTL bodystyles would appeal to me right off the bat due to prototype fidelity issues, even before determining whether or not the deco scheme is appropriate/accurate. So seeing an MTL release that appeals to me is the exception rather than the rules these days.
Does anybody know if the green CP box car with the Pacman logo (#020 00 936) is correct? (The combination of running board and ACI tag is unusual, but possible.)
Does anybody know if the green CP box car with the Pacman logo (#020 00 936) is correct? (The combination of running board and ACI tag is unusual, but possible.)Cheers,Javier
AFAIK the pacman logo was introduced on July 17th, 1968 . I thought that when they did paint this boxcar (obviously after that date), the running board would have been removed.Javier
Normally that would be a likely situation. In this case however, MTL did it right (at least for 1970).http://freight.railfan.ca/cgi-bin/image.pl?i=cp58702&o=cprailJason
Except it appears that the Pac-Man herald on the model is on the left end on both sides of the car, instead of the B-end on both sides. In the prototype photo, it's on the B-end. In the model photo, it's on the A-end.
Love that scheme and need some for the newsprint dock. Would the new Atlas PS car work for this series?Best wishes, Dave
Depends how close you're going for. The roof looks likes like a Pullman roof and the National Steel ends are similar to the PS one's but the sides are riveted. One thing to look at would be maybe the IM 1937 Modified box car to get the sides and the Athearn 50' PS car for the door, but I'd have to look closer to be sure.Jason