Author Topic: B unit being used without A?  (Read 2432 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

CBQ Fan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3470
  • Respect: +358
B unit being used without A?
« on: December 08, 2013, 04:48:26 PM »
0
So does anyone have photographic proof of a desperate crew using a B unit to move cars without benefit of an A unit.  They say there is a prototype for anything you might want to model.  This seems like a good test.
Brian

Way of the Zephyr

RWCJr

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 176
  • Respect: 0
Re: B unit being used without A?
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2013, 04:58:09 PM »
0
Model railroad magazine ran a N scale layout building series (also later sold as a magazine) on a Clinchfield railroad layout. One of the photos was of a B F-unit that was used by the prototype to switch a mine. Robert

Chris333

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 18560
  • Respect: +5872
« Last Edit: December 08, 2013, 05:01:10 PM by Chris333 »

delamaize

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2415
  • Gender: Male
  • Prairie Line Native
  • Respect: +582
Re: B unit being used without A?
« Reply #3 on: December 08, 2013, 05:00:48 PM »
0
B nits usually had a basic control stand to allow a unit to be moved around sans a unit. If they used b units for switching or shuffling cars, I dunno
Mike

Northern Pacific, Tacoma Division, 4th subdivision "The Prarie Line" (still in planning stages)

kalbert

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 459
  • Respect: 0
Re: B unit being used without A?
« Reply #4 on: December 08, 2013, 07:18:13 PM »
0
Would a B maybe have been equipped with remote control?

jnevis

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 760
  • Gender: Male
  • WP Lives
  • Respect: +18
Re: B unit being used without A?
« Reply #5 on: December 08, 2013, 07:23:42 PM »
0
WP B units had a headlight and control stand for hosting around the yard, but I don't think they used them for actual car moves.
Can't model worth a darn, but can research like an SOB.

rswinnerton

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1313
  • Gender: Male
  • The Anti-Ed
  • Respect: +20
    • Luxury Rail Travel
Re: B unit being used without A?
« Reply #6 on: December 08, 2013, 08:54:31 PM »
0
Most B units had what are called "Hostler Controls". Somewhere, I've got pics of them moving some cars around in a yard. Eds Law applies.
Russ
Russ Swinnerton
Dr. of Ferroequinology
www.LuxRailTravel.com

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11024
  • Respect: +2566
Re: B unit being used without A?
« Reply #7 on: December 08, 2013, 09:46:25 PM »
0
^^^ Ditto.

40 years ago I was blatantly trespassing in SP's Taylor Yard engine facility, and witnessed an F7B pushing a dead something-or-other around the shops.

FWIW, SP's three DD35s (double-engine B hood units) had a single chime horn operated from the hostler stand.
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

nkalanaga

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 10022
  • Respect: +1527
Re: B unit being used without A?
« Reply #8 on: December 09, 2013, 12:58:12 AM »
0
It wouldn't be at all hard for your railroad to cut windows in a B unit and install proper controls.  Other than the Haysi mine switcher I don't know of anyone doing it, as you'd have a switcher with very poor rear visibility, but it wouldn't be any worse than the MILW using one of their boxcab electrics as a switcher.  They did that several times through their history, including many years in Harlowton, MT. 
N Kalanaga
Be well

cv_acr

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2676
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +132
    • Canadian Freight Railcar Gallery
Re: B unit being used without A?
« Reply #9 on: December 09, 2013, 01:38:48 PM »
0
I've heard (sorry don't have the reference) of a situation that apparently happened on a PC train, where the lead unit developed some sort of serious issues and actually had to be set out. The trailing unit was a GP9B, and the crew ended up bringing the train into the next terminal using the controls on this B unit.

As luck would have it, some photographer captured this event and the photo is apparently published in a book somewhere, but I've personally only heard this secondhand, so I don't know what publication that might be.

Ntrainz1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 338
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +94
    • blog
Re: B unit being used without A?
« Reply #10 on: December 09, 2013, 07:16:55 PM »
0
Penn Central Power page 67, GP9B leading freight on Northeast Corridor.

eric220

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3719
  • Gender: Male
  • Continuing my abomination unto history
  • Respect: +627
    • The Modern PRR
Re: B unit being used without A?
« Reply #11 on: December 09, 2013, 08:51:57 PM »
0
I've heard (sorry don't have the reference) of a situation that apparently happened on a PC train, where the lead unit developed some sort of serious issues and actually had to be set out. The trailing unit was a GP9B, and the crew ended up bringing the train into the next terminal using the controls on this B unit.

As luck would have it, some photographer captured this event and the photo is apparently published in a book somewhere, but I've personally only heard this secondhand, so I don't know what publication that might be.

If anyone was desperate enough to do it, it would have been the PC.
-Eric

Modeling a transcontinental PRR
http://www.pennsylvania-railroad.com

nkalanaga

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 10022
  • Respect: +1527
Re: B unit being used without A?
« Reply #12 on: December 10, 2013, 01:51:06 AM »
0
A similar incident happened years ago on the CB&Q, but they got a little luckier.  The lead unit on a passenger train, in AB(B?)A configuration, had to be set out.  They ran the train from the rear A unit, with the brakeman standing in the end door of the B unit, holding a white lantern and the angle cock.  The lantern satisfied the rule saying they had to have a headlight, and in case of an emergency, he could dump the air.  I don't know how far they went that way, but apparently it was some distance, and at mainline speeds.  I wouldn't have wanted that job...
N Kalanaga
Be well

cv_acr

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2676
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +132
    • Canadian Freight Railcar Gallery
Re: B unit being used without A?
« Reply #13 on: December 10, 2013, 03:24:06 PM »
0
Penn Central Power page 67, GP9B leading freight on Northeast Corridor.

Thanks, that sounds like the one they were talking about.

CBQ Fan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3470
  • Respect: +358
Re: B unit being used without A?
« Reply #14 on: December 11, 2013, 08:38:52 PM »
0
A similar incident happened years ago on the CB&Q, but they got a little luckier.  The lead unit on a passenger train, in AB(B?)A configuration, had to be set out.  They ran the train from the rear A unit, with the brakeman standing in the end door of the B unit, holding a white lantern and the angle cock.  The lantern satisfied the rule saying they had to have a headlight, and in case of an emergency, he could dump the air.  I don't know how far they went that way, but apparently it was some distance, and at mainline speeds.  I wouldn't have wanted that job...
This and the PC unit are exactly the kind of stories I am looking for.
Brian

Way of the Zephyr