0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
If I understand your comment, if you have two separate bridges then each needs to be supported at its ends and so a pier in the middle is needed. What I have noticed with bridges perhaps different from other models is that structural transgressions are much more readily noticeable. Things like a lack of bridge shoes, or not supporting girder bridges at the vertical seams, or lack of ballast walls where the scenery calls for them or lattice on the wrong side of an engineered girder. The eye seems to notice this lack of "flow" and strength in the inherent loads and stress a bridge should be carrying. When I have thought about cutting corners, or more frequently when I have made a mistake, I end up fixing it as it just plain looks wrong. My $0.02md
Eric,That's awesome. Any detail on how you did it?
The correct term is not 'shoe' but rather 'bearing'. As in 'The bridge is bearing all of it's weight at this support point'. ..Bruce