0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
Putting this on my calendar to attend. Not as an operator, though--I'll just stand around and make fun of everyone else...
Wouldn't it be logical for the D&H train to roll on through to Windsor Street on its way to Pot Yards, too? Didn't that traverse the Port Road? I recall seeing D&H-powered trains on the corridor in the early 80s.Better get some 38-2s in lightnin' stripe before you tear it all down.Lee
If your date is after 1984, it was Guilford at that point, so anything from MEC, B&M, and D&H would be appropriate for a D&H train. In fact, I think they started pooling power before the merger/buyout/whatever..
Surely those L&HR clunkers weren't rated for the corridor, but a leisurely trip down the NCR would have them in your yard, no problem!
I can add to that, I did find plenty of shots of "whatever runs" at or on trains to Enola, but not for/at Pot yard, and I only looked for a few mins! I think they had runs that terminated at Enola, separate jobs from the ones for Pot yard. But I'm just going by photo evidence,however, I have some books on the D&H I can dig out later, so I'll see what I can find out.
From "Bridge Line Blues":"D&H equipped GP39-2s 7611-7620 with cab signals to enable them to run on the NEC. Though the Washington trains were handled exclusively by the 7600s and other EMDs, D&H Alcos were used on Enola trains."It makes no mention of GEs, but I'd guess they were considered more reliable than the Alcos?The ex-CR GP40s purchased by Guilford(1984, I think), assigned to B&M, most of which were patched in their CR or PC colors, also had cab signals, though some were removed...
85. And yep. That makes it even more fun. Except... I think I read somewhere that the fun stuff (like MEC U18Bs and various Alcos) weren't equipped or cleared for use on the Northeast Corridor. Which is a bummer. Because I'd love an excuse to have a U18B and C420.
What you want is an excuse to run a consist such as the one shown from 0:56 to 1:06 in this video: