0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
yeah, but isn't that still "addition" at the core? It should have been CxS. or C(S). But I suppose it works if you take knowledge and logic out of it...PCX- Multiplying the Penn by the Central.Too bad it all equals zero anyways thanks to the NYC and the zero property of multiplication it brings to the table
Based on this, CXS would have been better! Chessie X Seaboard...
I'm as big an SPF as they come, but the fact is Pennsy brought the NYC down and it was Pennsy's late-in-life vapid leadership that drive PC into the toilet. NYC was the vastly more efficient of the two roads with more forward-looking leadership.
Failures in leadership have felled many giants. It's a fairly good bet we would still have at least one more transcontinental mainline if the Milwaukee Road had had proper forward-looking leadership during the 1970s.
Let's not forget Fairbanks-Morris which dithered away an order for 150 TrainMaster's! They couldn't decide if they wanted to keep making locomotives.
Unless your railway is in England... then the government brings you down and/or conglomerates everyone into a nationalized, government-run system with crappy paint choices.-Cody F.
And it's been known since at least the time they merged since I remember reading about it in Trains or whatever back when...From CSX's Facebook Page:"The Chessie System and Seaboard Coast Line Industries Inc. came together and CSX Corporation was created to serve the eastern half of the nation. The C stands for Chessie, the S for Seaboard, and the X for the multiplication effect, recognizing the two companies coming together."
Yes, I knew that but ask John Q Public what CSX means.
Ask John Q Public what anything means. Mostly you'll get head scratching and shoulder shrugging.