« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Coupler ID?  (Read 1122 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

PJPickard

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 205
  • Respect: +27
Coupler ID?
« on: January 02, 2013, 01:59:35 PM »
0
Anyone recognize this coupler? I found it in my parts box, its 20+ years old.

Thanks,

Paul



(edit, fixed image url - gfh)
« Last Edit: January 02, 2013, 02:09:25 PM by GaryHinshaw »
Logged

Kisatchie

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4180
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +62
Re: Coupler ID?
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2013, 02:03:49 PM »
0
It looks like an Intermountain coupler.


Hmm... or a Roundhouse
coupler...

Logged
Two scientists create a teleportation ray, and they try it out on a cricket. They put the cricket on one of the two teleportation pads in the room, and they turn the ray on.
The cricket jumps across the room onto the other pad.
"It works! It works!"

Sokramiketes

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4971
  • Better modeling through peer pressure...
  • Respect: +1525
    • Modutrak
Re: Coupler ID?
« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2013, 02:04:09 PM »
0
Intermountain.  Throw it out.
Logged

PJPickard

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 205
  • Respect: +27
Re: Coupler ID?
« Reply #3 on: January 02, 2013, 02:05:38 PM »
0
Well OK then...I like that it has no trip pin...

Thanks guys.

Paul
Logged

bbussey

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8889
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +4712
    • www.bbussey.net
Re: Coupler ID?
« Reply #4 on: January 02, 2013, 02:31:10 PM »
0
In addition to having no trip pin, it is non-functioning.  It has the appearance of the MTL coupler knuckles of the time period, but they won't automatically couple if you bump them together.
Logged
Bryan Busséy
NHRHTA #2246
NSE #1117
www.bbussey.net

Sokramiketes

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4971
  • Better modeling through peer pressure...
  • Respect: +1525
    • Modutrak
Re: Coupler ID?
« Reply #5 on: January 02, 2013, 02:32:55 PM »
0
Quote from: PJPickard on January 02, 2013, 02:05:38 PM
Well OK then...I like that it has no trip pin...

Thanks guys.

Paul

It also doesn't stay coupled.  Being a single piece design, that allows a wide enough spread to couple... it also has enough spread to uncouple just as easily.

They were sort of OK when coupled to some other coupler like MTL, but coupled to each other they would bounce apart regularly.
Logged

Sokramiketes

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4971
  • Better modeling through peer pressure...
  • Respect: +1525
    • Modutrak
Re: Coupler ID?
« Reply #6 on: January 02, 2013, 02:33:49 PM »
0
Quote from: bbussey on January 02, 2013, 02:31:10 PM
In addition to having no trip pin, it is non-functioning.  It has the appearance of the MTL coupler knuckles of the time period, but they won't automatically couple if you bump them together.

They would automatically couple if bumped... then uncouple when you didn't want them to.
Logged

VonRyan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3083
  • Gender: Male
  • Running on fumes
  • Respect: +641
Re: Coupler ID?
« Reply #7 on: January 02, 2013, 03:24:24 PM »
0
I never had any problem with the roundhouse version that would drop in to replace rapido couplers. They worked quite well actually in keeping trains together. the intermountain version sucked when it its own trucks. At least thats they way it was for the tank car kit I built, sans the way-too-heavy weight.

-Cody F.
Logged
Cody W Fisher  —  Wandering soul from a bygone era.
Tired.
Fighting to reclaim shreds of the past.

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24733
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9244
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Coupler ID?
« Reply #8 on: January 02, 2013, 03:40:17 PM »
0
Yeah, those things are gnarly.

I think I might have one or two sets still in service, but they're rather finicky.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »