Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Home
Help
Gallery
Search
Stats
Login
Register
TheRailwire
»
General Discussion
»
Layout Engineering Reports
»
Layout expansion debate on the Pacific Interchange RR
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Layout expansion debate on the Pacific Interchange RR (Read 1828 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Flagler
Crew
Posts: 391
Respect:
-43
Layout expansion debate on the Pacific Interchange RR
«
on:
December 01, 2012, 10:21:53 AM »
0
Should I go North or West? The North Route would be a 32 ft long 2% run that loops back on itself untill it reaches the reaversing loop.
Industries along the way are Glacer Gravel , the Mountain Lumber saw mill & a small town and freight yard within the Reverse loop area.The scenery would be Mountains with Tunnels & Bridges.
The West route would be a straight narrow 12" wide shelf that runs for 24ft & then reverses back.
The scenery would be farm land. The industries are TBD. The are would be flat with no Grade.
This will reduce my isle width from 44" to 32". I only have guests a few times /year.
-fixed spelling in subject line. -gfh
«
Last Edit: December 01, 2012, 01:26:27 PM by GaryHinshaw
»
Logged
LIRR
Crew
Posts: 1285
Respect:
+1804
Re: Layoyt Expansion debate on the Pacific Interchange RR
«
Reply #1 on:
December 01, 2012, 11:09:48 AM »
0
Wy not both?
Logged
Flagler
Crew
Posts: 391
Respect:
-43
Re: Layoyt Expansion debate on the Pacific Interchange RR
«
Reply #2 on:
December 01, 2012, 01:10:20 PM »
0
I have a 3rd expansion plan also that goes east, I like the idea of doing both,but what should I do and complete 1st.
Logged
packers#1
Crew
Posts: 1479
Gender:
Modern Shortline Modeler
Respect:
+562
Re: Layout expansion debate on the Pacific Interchange RR
«
Reply #3 on:
December 01, 2012, 02:08:13 PM »
0
Really, in my mind, I'd go north first. You already know what you want to do, it sounds more fun to build, and that's a very scenic description.
However, the West sounds easier to complete, so if you want to quickly expand, I'd go for that
Logged
Sawyer Berry
Clemson University graduate, c/o 2018
American manufacturing isn’t dead, it’s just gotten high tech
Flagler
Crew
Posts: 391
Respect:
-43
Re: Layout expansion debate on the Pacific Interchange RR
«
Reply #4 on:
December 02, 2012, 10:01:09 AM »
0
I have decided to go West. I need to make sure I have it finished for NMRA in July 2013.
This section is basically a Staging Yard that can be viewed
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
TheRailwire
»
General Discussion
»
Layout Engineering Reports
»
Layout expansion debate on the Pacific Interchange RR