Author Topic: Cisco Bridges: a new layout concept  (Read 140507 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Scottl

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4850
  • Respect: +1523
Re: Cisco Bridges: a new layout concept
« Reply #765 on: September 30, 2017, 04:01:13 PM »
0
Thanks guys.  It's like any layout with some issues, but also lots of things I'm happy about.

The reach is fine to the entire canyon-tunnel section.  The real risk (knock on wood) is a tunnel derailment, one is quite long and it is nearly inaccessible in there.  Next layout, I'll put re-railers in hidden places like that.

The foam for the other river shore is roughed in and the caulk is curing.  It is amazing how quickly it can happen with few hours of work.  The next stage is the fascia and some Sculptamold.

Bendtracker1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1466
  • Remember The Rock!
  • Respect: +1398
    • The Little Rock Line
Re: Cisco Bridges: a new layout concept
« Reply #766 on: September 30, 2017, 05:54:35 PM »
0
I can't even imagine you tearing this layout down, after the hours and hours of work that have resulted in a beautiful layout.  I'm sure it has its drawbacks, as all layouts do, but I'm glad it survives.  I hope you now feel the same way.

DFF

I'll echo Dave's words.....

Scottl

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4850
  • Respect: +1523
Re: Cisco Bridges: a new layout concept
« Reply #767 on: October 01, 2017, 09:26:50 AM »
+1
I'm trying to sort out the CP track on the newly formed east shore of the river.  I have space to put in a nice broad curve, something like 18" radius, but test shots suggest it rarely shows up and I wonder if it is worth the effort and space.  I could use the space for more foreground filler scenery, which is always in short supply.

2017-10-01 09.03.19 by Scott L, on Flickr

2017-10-01 09.03.45 by Scott L, on Flickr

2017-10-01 09.04.32 by Scott L, on Flickr

2017-10-01 09.04.43 by Scott L, on Flickr

This view shows the CP line but I have to be careful to not catch the edge of the layout on the right.  The foam where the CP track is located will be tapered downwards more and the track on roadbed.

2017-10-01 09.06.24 by Scott L, on Flickr

Scottl

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4850
  • Respect: +1523
Re: Cisco Bridges: a new layout concept
« Reply #768 on: October 01, 2017, 09:34:47 AM »
0
Still composing this scene.  For reference, this is the scene I'm working on, a shot taken in early winter.

2015-12-08 11.24.36 by Scott L, on Flickr

If I leave out the CP line (or somehow reduce it's footprint) I will have more room for the suspension bridge used to access the tunnels by maintenance.  I was going to do this in etched brass at some stage and it requires some gravel road access.  I'm compressing the scene quite a bit even if I leave out the CP line.

2015-12-08 11.36.15 by Scott L, on Flickr

2015-12-08 11.36.35 by Scott L, on Flickr

Bendtracker1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1466
  • Remember The Rock!
  • Respect: +1398
    • The Little Rock Line
Re: Cisco Bridges: a new layout concept
« Reply #769 on: October 01, 2017, 11:09:42 AM »
+1
That's gonna be a killer scene Scott.
If it were I, I would leave the CP trackage out and focus on the footbridge.
If you wind up with enough room, then maybe add the track.

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11687
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +6818
Re: Cisco Bridges: a new layout concept
« Reply #770 on: October 01, 2017, 11:16:26 AM »
0
That's gonna be a killer scene Scott.
If it were I, I would leave the CP trackage out and focus on the footbridge.
If you wind up with enough room, then maybe add the track.


What Allen said.

DFF

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!

Scottl

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4850
  • Respect: +1523
Re: Cisco Bridges: a new layout concept
« Reply #771 on: October 01, 2017, 11:45:39 AM »
0
Thanks guys.  The bridge is really neat and unique and is a great railfan spot as well.  It is probably more recognizable than a short stretch of CP track.  I think I'll forego the extra track.  As they say, less is more!

Angus Shops

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 779
  • Respect: +275
Re: Cisco Bridges: a new layout concept
« Reply #772 on: October 01, 2017, 01:28:34 PM »
0
Having the opposite bank (CP side) in the composition really reinforces the idea that the scene is in the bottom of a steep river canyon. I'm not sure you need the CP track, but it helps set the stage if you can manage it, but so would the access road, or maybe the access road and a hint of the highway. I notice in a couple of your photos that you can't actually see the bank between the track and the river; if this is typical of the normal viewing position you might be able to get away with steepening the bank a bit to give you more space for the scenic features you want to emphasize.
Geoff

GaryHinshaw

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6346
  • Respect: +1869
Re: Cisco Bridges: a new layout concept
« Reply #773 on: October 01, 2017, 01:31:04 PM »
0
I would omit the track.  The thing that strikes me about the mock-up you made is that the curve is too tight for this scene.  There is indeed a sweeping curve in the prototype line here, but your mock-up is almost a horseshoe.  Save those for Tehachapi.  ;)



Excellent angle!

mark dance

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1028
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1279
    • The N Scale Columbia and Western
Re: Cisco Bridges: a new layout concept
« Reply #774 on: October 01, 2017, 04:17:27 PM »
0
One more vote or leaving out the CP track and the opposite bank.  I think this will give you more room for a camera and interesting viewing/photo angles.  (you could always put it in later if you change your mind I suppose...easier than ripping it out and redoing the river.)

beautiful scene...and execution

md
Youtube Videos of the N Scale Columbia & Western at: markdance63
Photos and track plan of of the N Scale Columbia & Western at:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27907618@N02/sets/72157624106602402/

Scottl

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4850
  • Respect: +1523
Re: Cisco Bridges: a new layout concept
« Reply #775 on: October 01, 2017, 08:49:14 PM »
0
I think everyone is right, I want to avoid trying to cram too much into the scene and the CP track would be of limited scenic value.  I can grade the slope on the east bank to be less  compressed and there should be ample room for the maintenance bridge.

Santa Fe Guy

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1096
  • Respect: +359
Re: Cisco Bridges: a new layout concept
« Reply #776 on: October 01, 2017, 09:13:58 PM »
0
Kinda tough call I reckon Scott.
I wanted to include both sides of the cliffs when we built our N Scale Thompson River Canyon layout way back, we tried to fit it in so folks could get the feel of the area however we could not pull it off.
To be able to see both sides even at one viewing angle would look stunning if it could be pulled off.
Rod.
Santafesd40.blogspot.com

Scottl

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4850
  • Respect: +1523
Re: Cisco Bridges: a new layout concept
« Reply #777 on: October 02, 2017, 08:15:49 AM »
0
Your layout was very effective at giving the feel of the canyon.  Putting in the other bank is tricky, and I have not fully settled on how I will do it, but I think the location of the maintenance bridge will be one location I try it.

The prototype is a bit surreal in this regard, with the west bank composed of rock bluffs and sparse tree cover, while the east bank is more gentle sediment and grass cover.  There are no rock outcrops near the river at all, just some boulders and gravel in the shore area.  It will take some careful planning for it to not look mismatched in model form.  Unfortunately,  pictures of the east bank are rare, and I did not think to take many myself on numerous visits. 

mark dance

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1028
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1279
    • The N Scale Columbia and Western
Re: Cisco Bridges: a new layout concept
« Reply #778 on: October 02, 2017, 11:07:09 AM »
0
Your layout was very effective at giving the feel of the canyon.  Putting in the other bank is tricky, and I have not fully settled on how I will do it, but I think the location of the maintenance bridge will be one location I try it.

The prototype is a bit surreal in this regard, with the west bank composed of rock bluffs and sparse tree cover, while the east bank is more gentle sediment and grass cover.  There are no rock outcrops near the river at all, just some boulders and gravel in the shore area.  It will take some careful planning for it to not look mismatched in model form.  Unfortunately,  pictures of the east bank are rare, and I did not think to take many myself on numerous visits.

What about using a "temporary", gently-sloping foam block covered in ground cover and static grasses that can be clamped anywhere along the front of the layout to suit photos only?  If done right you could use HO figures or vehicles occasionally to force perspective.  (I use temporary scenery and backdrops for photos when I am trying to hide things)

md
Youtube Videos of the N Scale Columbia & Western at: markdance63
Photos and track plan of of the N Scale Columbia & Western at:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27907618@N02/sets/72157624106602402/

Scottl

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4850
  • Respect: +1523
Re: Cisco Bridges: a new layout concept
« Reply #779 on: October 02, 2017, 12:08:30 PM »
0
That is a great idea.  I was working on that idea with the Cisco scene but it could be used here to great advantage.