Author Topic: Jersey City Industrial Railroad Micro-Layout  (Read 104495 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24745
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9272
    • Conrail 1285
Re: White River and Northern VI
« Reply #75 on: May 15, 2013, 09:12:06 PM »
0
I'd say "South Hoboken Industrial Transfer", but someone's already doing that.

Chris333

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 18396
  • Respect: +5667
Re: White River and Northern VI
« Reply #76 on: May 15, 2013, 09:12:22 PM »
0
Reminds me of Lee's 44 tons of fun...

Call it "late for dinner".   :P

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11229
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9343
Re: White River and Northern VI
« Reply #77 on: May 15, 2013, 09:19:38 PM »
0
Trenton Industrial Transfer Service.

packers#1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1479
  • Gender: Male
  • Modern Shortline Modeler
  • Respect: +562
Re: White River and Northern VI
« Reply #78 on: May 15, 2013, 09:23:46 PM »
0
Jersey City Belt Line

The Terminal Railroad of New Jersey

The Terminal Railroad of Jersey City
Sawyer Berry
Clemson University graduate, c/o 2018
American manufacturing isn’t dead, it’s just gotten high tech

MichaelWinicki

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2096
  • Respect: +335
Re: White River and Northern VI
« Reply #79 on: May 15, 2013, 09:29:14 PM »
0
Great track plan David!

I look forward to seeing the "downtown" area come together.

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11229
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9343
Re: White River and Northern VI
« Reply #80 on: May 15, 2013, 09:30:11 PM »
0
Hoboken And North Dover.

That way the yard master can call the crew for a HAND job.

Chris333

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 18396
  • Respect: +5667
Re: White River and Northern VI
« Reply #81 on: May 15, 2013, 09:36:56 PM »
0
Needs moar 0-6-0 camelback.  :)

conrail98

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1456
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +41
Re: White River and Northern VI
« Reply #82 on: May 15, 2013, 10:50:55 PM »
0
Trenton Industrial Transfer Service.

I see what you did there.
- Phil

S Class

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 300
  • Respect: +5
Re: White River and Northern VI
« Reply #83 on: May 16, 2013, 08:14:47 AM »
0
This, I like this and think it would make a cathartic change for you after the last few semi rural layouts.

May I suggest the Bayonne, Arlington, Clifton & Orange North?


Edit: I just had a thought DKS, why not call one of the served industries "White River (somethingorother)" and have the line as an industrial owned short line that just happens to offer some common carrier to neighbouring businesses? (which would explain the "Northern") maybe just ad "Industrial Services" after the name.

Not hard to place in reality given the existence of similar such lines over the border in NYC.


Actually, brain wave number 2: "White River Wholesale Foods" then you have any valid reason for boxcars of Maine spuds, Midwest canned goods or reefers of Western citrus etc.
« Last Edit: May 16, 2013, 08:32:07 AM by S Class »
Regards
Tony A

Philip H

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8910
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1655
    • Layout Progress Blog
Re: White River and Northern VI
« Reply #84 on: May 16, 2013, 08:28:58 AM »
0
This, I like this and think it would make a cathartic change for you after the last few semi rural layouts.

May I suggest the Bayonne, Arlington, Clifton & Orange North?

B.A.C.O.N.  Nice! a subsidiary of T.I.T.S.

We could have it be the precursor to Baconrail . . .  for which many of us already have decals! :ashat:
Philip H.
Chief Everything Officer
Baton Rouge Southern RR - Mount Rainier Division.


Lemosteam

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5919
  • Gender: Male
  • PRR, The Standard Railroad of my World
  • Respect: +3667
    • Designer at Keystone Details
Re: White River and Northern VI
« Reply #85 on: May 16, 2013, 09:40:17 AM »
0
Hoboken And North Dover.

That way the yard master can call the crew for a HAND job.


 :facepalm: :D

VonRyan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3083
  • Gender: Male
  • Running on fumes
  • Respect: +641
Re: White River and Northern VI
« Reply #86 on: May 16, 2013, 10:49:49 AM »
0
Nope. Actually, think Jersey City. I'm toying with the idea of the Newport and Jersey City RR.

That describes me better than the layout.
Not sure yet. Toying with the idea of maybe the 40s.

Hmm... perhaps we are kindred spirits... (or more of I wish to walk within your footsteps)

I need to get cracking before you go and have all of your gatorfoam cut and glued.  :D


-Cody F.
Cody W Fisher  —  Wandering soul from a bygone era.
Tired.
Fighting to reclaim shreds of the past.

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24745
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9272
    • Conrail 1285
Re: White River and Northern VI
« Reply #87 on: May 16, 2013, 11:45:58 AM »
0
All joking aside, Jersey City Terminal sounds pretty realistic. Or just calling it the Ironbound. But, I think naming it that might be a bit anachronistic, since the railroad would be the cause of the name, not the other way around.

But, I'm sure, that no matter what you name it, it's gonna be sick.

The 40s would be a cool time period, as would the 1980s. You could get away with not having sidings into everything in the 80s, and having plenty of abandoned stuff too. Plus, I've been wanting to see some good 80s urban modeling involving the true 80s urban vibe... (ie, murders and drug dealers).

DKS

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 13424
  • Respect: +7026
Re: White River and Northern VI
« Reply #88 on: May 16, 2013, 12:03:20 PM »
0
The 40s would be a cool time period, as would the 1980s. You could get away with not having sidings into everything in the 80s, and having plenty of abandoned stuff too.

Yes, I do have a penchant for abandoned stuff, and I really am torn between 40s and 70s-80s. I've even thought about a dual-era layout, with some replaceable structures representing active and abandoned states. The only thing that can't be swapped out, of course, is weedy, overgrown track. We'll see.

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11675
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +6801
Re: White River and Northern VI
« Reply #89 on: May 16, 2013, 12:12:53 PM »
0
Yes, I do have a penchant for abandoned stuff, and I really am torn between 40s and 70s-80s. I've even thought about a dual-era layout, with some replaceable structures representing active and abandoned states. The only thing that can't be swapped out, of course, is weedy, overgrown track. We'll see.

I like the dual-era concept.

As for swapping out the weedy, overgrown track, I think you could find a way to do that.  For example, mount the entire plot for the industry (including track, structure, and perhaps even the parking lot) on a piece of foamcore or Masonite that could "pop-out."  The track could be powered by feeders which have a quick-disconnect plug.  Build a cassette for each of the different eras.

DFF

P.S. I give a thumbs-up to your new layout design and look forward to your progress.  I'm certain that I'll learn something about urban modeling along the way.

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!