Author Topic: Layout Humor  (Read 2013 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ljudice

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3368
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +245
    • NS/CR Camp Car Models
Layout Humor
« on: August 18, 2012, 09:20:22 PM »
0
Someone at Global 1 is in BIG TROUBLE:


CBQ Fan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3456
  • Respect: +351
Re: Layout Humor
« Reply #1 on: August 18, 2012, 09:29:45 PM »
0
 :facepalm: :o :RUEffinKiddingMe: :D
Brian

Way of the Zephyr

ljudice

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3368
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +245
    • NS/CR Camp Car Models
Re: Layout Humor
« Reply #2 on: August 18, 2012, 10:03:21 PM »
0
You have to wonder though, I know stacks are operating in Australia, India and China - plus the US.

Obviously, there are clearance issues, but let's say a railroad that stretches thousands of miles across a barren
landscape could you triple or quadruple stack?  Center of gravity limiting factor? 

I guess the real clearance problem is you eventually hit a bridge which can't be modified.

 


VonRyan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3083
  • Gender: Male
  • Running on fumes
  • Respect: +641
Re: Layout Humor
« Reply #3 on: August 18, 2012, 10:26:22 PM »
0
I'm sensing the possibility for some 1:1 scale testing... someone call R&D!  :D

-Cody F.
Cody W Fisher  —  Wandering soul from a bygone era.
Tired.
Fighting to reclaim shreds of the past.

Bsklarski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 673
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +6
    • B&M Conn River Line
Re: Layout Humor
« Reply #4 on: August 18, 2012, 10:45:54 PM »
0
I could see harmonic rock coming into play here and with loaded containers, it wouldnt be pretty
Brian Sklarski
Engineer, New England Central Railroad

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Boston-Maine-Conn-River-Line/173358446076160

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 10878
  • Respect: +2421
Re: Layout Humor
« Reply #5 on: August 18, 2012, 10:49:53 PM »
0
Quote
I'm sensing the possibility for some 1:1 scale testing... someone call R&D!

I would think the geniuses at UP who came up with the 3-1/2 mile-long stack train a couple of years ago have given more than a passing thought to what it would take to do this. Yikes.

Quote
I could see harmonic rock coming into play...

Yeah. Me too! Their drummer kicks butt!  :ashat:  :D
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

Bob Bufkin

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6397
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +44
Re: Layout Humor
« Reply #6 on: August 18, 2012, 10:58:10 PM »
0
Also something we called wind sale in the Navy.  Wind forces against the sides could easily topple the cars.  It's happened with double stacks quite often.

Hyperion

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 992
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +19
Re: Layout Humor
« Reply #7 on: August 18, 2012, 11:01:31 PM »
0
You have to wonder though, I know stacks are operating in Australia, India and China - plus the US.

Obviously, there are clearance issues, but let's say a railroad that stretches thousands of miles across a barren
landscape could you triple or quadruple stack?  Center of gravity limiting factor? 

I guess the real clearance problem is you eventually hit a bridge which can't be modified.

The real problem, believe it or not, is actually wind.

Wind blowing over trains is not exactly a rare occurrence -- as many as 20 derailments a year in the US are caused by winds.  It happens occasionally with autotracks, and even a rare grain train, but more often with intermodal ones.  There's virtually no way that a train of that height could roll across thousands of miles without tipping over because it probably wouldn't take a cross-wind of much more than 30mph to push it over.
-Mark

up1950s

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9753
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +2321
Re: Layout Humor
« Reply #8 on: August 18, 2012, 11:05:45 PM »
0
I could see harmonic rock coming into play here and with loaded containers, it wouldnt be pretty

Harmonic Rock N Roll


Richie Dost

ljudice

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3368
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +245
    • NS/CR Camp Car Models
Re: Layout Humor
« Reply #9 on: August 18, 2012, 11:34:10 PM »
0
Of course wind!    One thing not present in the basement!

 :D

PGE-N°2

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 208
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: 0
Re: Layout Humor
« Reply #10 on: August 18, 2012, 11:40:09 PM »
0
Of course wind!    One thing not present in the basement!

 :D

Set up a fan beside the layout, or even one ill-timed, misdirected sneeze could easily do it for you!  :scared:
Director of Operations of the Kettle River Railway

See photos of the original owner's layout here:
https://m.flickr.com/#/photos/about-face/sets/72157603977732928/

It sounded like a good idea at the time... too bad the caboose wasn't in on the plan.

nkalanaga

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9901
  • Respect: +1447
Re: Layout Humor
« Reply #11 on: August 19, 2012, 02:26:28 AM »
0
Wind doesn't require high profile vehicles to cause problems.  The MILW and GN both had wind problems in the steam era, the MILW at Beverly, WA, and the GN east of Glacier Park in Montana.  The MILW finally installed wind gauges and connected them to the signals at Beverly to close the Columbia River bridge in high winds.
N Kalanaga
Be well

John

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 13404
  • Respect: +3262
Re: Layout Humor
« Reply #12 on: August 19, 2012, 07:55:34 AM »
0
Of course wind!    One thing not present in the basement!

 :D

Do you frequent operating seesions?   :tommann: :trollface:

Bendtracker1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1466
  • Remember The Rock!
  • Respect: +1398
    • The Little Rock Line
Re: Layout Humor
« Reply #13 on: August 19, 2012, 09:22:41 AM »
0
The Northwestern had the same problem at Boone, IA on their Kate Shelly High Bridge.
Above the span over the river there is a Windometer that triggers two signals on each end of the bridge.
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=161481&nseq=34