Author Topic: Wisconsin Central - Heritage Division  (Read 134409 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

w neal

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1434
  • Respect: +483
Re: Wisconsin Central - Heritage Division
« Reply #135 on: September 21, 2012, 12:41:16 PM »
0
No need really. I've always owned them.  ;)

(Although, I did paint up a couple more and sold them to a friend.)
« Last Edit: September 21, 2012, 12:48:45 PM by w neal »
Buffering...

Rabidchipmoose

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 26
  • Respect: 0
Re: Wisconsin Central - Heritage Division
« Reply #136 on: September 21, 2012, 11:13:47 PM »
0
I'm thinking the hay fever fields look great.  I had recently been admiring them in real life and thing you did a great job catching the flavor.  Also, give the GBW locos a hug for me....

w neal

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1434
  • Respect: +483
Re: Wisconsin Central - Heritage Division
« Reply #137 on: September 24, 2012, 06:38:19 AM »
0
More lineside poles. Not sure how I feel about them. I was always used to certain scenes being more "natural" looking. Now suddenly there is this element of regulated space in them. Certainly, the prototype demands them. I dunno, I guess its just me.  :|






Compare:








Or:





Buffering...

Kev1340

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 164
  • Respect: +3
Re: Wisconsin Central - Heritage Division
« Reply #138 on: September 24, 2012, 10:42:12 AM »
0
Your final photo, I think I agree looks better without the pole on the road side. The others, in my opinion the poles add to the scene.

Cheers,

Kev

svedblen

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 644
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +349
    • Three Yards Yard - beware - it is H0 - No, now it's O
Re: Wisconsin Central - Heritage Division
« Reply #139 on: September 24, 2012, 01:46:10 PM »
0
Nothing is wrong with the poles. Of course you shall keep them!

/Lennart
Lennart

Philip H

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8920
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1658
    • Layout Progress Blog
Re: Wisconsin Central - Heritage Division
« Reply #140 on: September 24, 2012, 02:04:51 PM »
0
Your final photo, I think I agree looks better without the pole on the road side. The others, in my opinion the poles add to the scene.

Cheers,

Kev

+1
Philip H.
Chief Everything Officer
Baton Rouge Southern RR - Mount Rainier Division.


packers#1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1484
  • Gender: Male
  • Modern Shortline Modeler
  • Respect: +565
Re: Wisconsin Central - Heritage Division
« Reply #141 on: September 24, 2012, 02:33:40 PM »
0
I like the final pic with the pole...but I think it'd look better without the lineside pole there and just a single power pole (no cross arms).
With the others, I really like the addition of the poles; like you said, there's some regulated space, which contrasts nicely with the wilderness
Sawyer Berry
Clemson University graduate, c/o 2018
American manufacturing isn’t dead, it’s just gotten high tech

w neal

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1434
  • Respect: +483
Re: Wisconsin Central - Heritage Division
« Reply #142 on: September 25, 2012, 06:22:39 AM »
0
Pole relocated. For some reason, I thought the railroad might have chosen to route the lines up and over the road, rather than have crowding issues at trackside. It did look a bit silly however. I did my best to squeeze it in trackside. Thanks all! Now its time to string more lines.

Buffering...

w neal

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1434
  • Respect: +483
Re: Wisconsin Central - Heritage Division
« Reply #143 on: September 25, 2012, 07:50:42 AM »
0
Tried to paint some background to represent distant fields. Well, I'm no Danneman. But with the addition of some 3-D foreground/background trees it works for me - mostly. The problem, to me, is that there are no colors from the foreground fields in the backdrop. There is no real blending of the two elements in terms of colors - as Danneman has taught me. I think thats the reason I have yet to see a photo backdrop that has beed rendered well.

Buffering...

conrailthomas519

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 341
  • Gender: Male
  • BNSF / Montana Rail Link
  • Respect: +11
Re: Wisconsin Central - Heritage Division
« Reply #144 on: September 25, 2012, 08:15:36 AM »
0
In order to get the blending color into the back drop. You would have to custom mix your paint colors by matching them to the forground materials.
TMM

kc9jts

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 147
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +22
    • my blog of miscellaneous info:
Re: Wisconsin Central - Heritage Division
« Reply #145 on: September 25, 2012, 08:36:23 AM »
0
Pole relocated. For some reason, I thought the railroad might have chosen to route the lines up and over the road, rather than have crowding issues at trackside. It did look a bit silly however. I did my best to squeeze it in trackside. Thanks all! Now its time to string more lines.



I think that looks better with the pole at track level; considering that it was likely installed well before the overpass was ever built (in a real world scenario).

NBT

w neal

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1434
  • Respect: +483
Re: Wisconsin Central - Heritage Division
« Reply #146 on: September 25, 2012, 08:36:17 PM »
0
In order to get the blending color into the back drop. You would have to custom mix your paint colors by matching them to the forground materials.


Yeah, I realize that. Right now, I'm just not sure I want to go back and repaint the scene.

Buffering...

w neal

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1434
  • Respect: +483
Re: Wisconsin Central - Heritage Division
« Reply #147 on: September 26, 2012, 07:14:00 AM »
0
I planned a portion of my mainline to pass behind the forest and only "peek" out at river crossings. While this goes against much of the modeling grain, I enjoy the view. It reminds me of many railfaning trips. Also, it emphasizes how the trains are sometimes dominated, or only pass through, the wilderness. It bodes well for highlighting that the environs are indeed dominated by trees.

My forest is modeled in cross section so that one has a nice view under the canopy. I have had to ask more than one visitor to look under the canopy to see the train in the 10 or so feet that I tried this effect.. But then, just hearing the train behind the canopy begs some to seek a way to view it.

The view above:







Crouch just a little:


« Last Edit: October 17, 2012, 10:00:26 PM by w neal »
Buffering...

conrailthomas519

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 341
  • Gender: Male
  • BNSF / Montana Rail Link
  • Respect: +11
Re: Wisconsin Central - Heritage Division
« Reply #148 on: September 26, 2012, 08:06:27 AM »
0
I like it alot! There are alot of times we cannot view the trains while out railfanning because of natural view blocks. This scene captures just that.
TMM

Kev1340

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 164
  • Respect: +3
Re: Wisconsin Central - Heritage Division
« Reply #149 on: September 26, 2012, 01:38:26 PM »
0
Pole relocated. For some reason, I thought the railroad might have chosen to route the lines up and over the road, rather than have crowding issues at trackside. It did look a bit silly however. I did my best to squeeze it in trackside. Thanks all! Now its time to string more lines.

I'm not certain of US practice as I've not had the opportunity to observe it, but here in the UK poles tend to reduce in height at the approach to an over bridge, then the lines are mounted to the side of the bridge, or indeed tunnel, until returning to poles on the far side.

Cheers,

Kev