0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Count the clothespins. The third tree from the left is hiding behind the fourth tree from this angle. DFF
@Cajonpassfan,"What is a yout?"The Hon. Chamberlain Haller
Only now I get it that you get it...a bit slow on the uptake.Nice trees btw, however many there are...Otto K.
Let's do the Sesame Street counting thing.
At the risk of being reviled and condemned, I submit the simple addition of a stream to this scene looks natural and also shows how the land was shaped. Not that Dave should do this, just as an illustration.That's a small trestle letting the creek go under the lower track as that goes under the upper track trestle. The stream mouth, where mud would accumulate, could also provide for a marshy/swampy area with reeds and cattails intruding into the lake. Probably a very Southern scene. Seems like everybody never realizes that whatever shape the land beneath them -- flat, hilly, rolling, or steep -- it all has been shaped by water, even tho there may not be any evidence of water on it now. Man's efforts must reach gigantic proportions to equal this. I just think including waterways of all kinds -- full of water or dry -- adds to the realism of a layout scene.I realize this is a topic nobody cares about but I think it's worthwhile. People get hepped up over the amount of rivets on a model's boiler or how high a PS-1 is, I get interested in what kind of drainage a layout has (or hasn't). I would also point out that any real railroad that ignores potential water flow along its ROW does so at its own peril.
You can see here how I shifted the drainage ditch on the right side of the track to between the trestle bents where it then drains into the lake:
@OldEastRR,As for the marshy/swampy area, I ordered some materials this week to begin working on the lake's shoreline.