Author Topic: Amoskeag Northern - Simonds Industrial Branch  (Read 86908 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

DKS

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 13424
  • Respect: +7026
Re: Amoskeag Northern - Simonds Industrial Branch
« Reply #390 on: January 09, 2013, 05:45:39 PM »
0


Based on this image, I don't see a need to change bridge types. Looks fine, in fact!

wazzou

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6728
  • #GoCougs
  • Respect: +1656
Re: Amoskeag Northern - Simonds Industrial Branch
« Reply #391 on: January 09, 2013, 05:46:00 PM »
0
That last shot already looks much improved.
Bryan

Member of NPRHA, Modeling Committee Member
http://www.nprha.org/
Member of MRHA


Bsklarski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 673
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +6
    • B&M Conn River Line
Re: Amoskeag Northern - Simonds Industrial Branch
« Reply #392 on: January 09, 2013, 05:54:59 PM »
0
HO scale atlas code 83 from the HO layout... weathered with a spray cans of tan, grey and black.









Brian Sklarski
Engineer, New England Central Railroad

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Boston-Maine-Conn-River-Line/173358446076160

Ian MacMillan

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12034
  • Gender: Male
  • Learn to use the god damn search feature!
  • Respect: +166
    • Conrail's Amoskeag Northern Division
Re: Amoskeag Northern - Simonds Industrial Branch
« Reply #393 on: January 09, 2013, 06:06:55 PM »
0
Ok so here is where we are at so far

From this:


To this:

I WANNA SEE THE BOAT MOVIE!

Yes... I'm in N... Also HO and 1:1

DKS

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 13424
  • Respect: +7026
Re: Amoskeag Northern - Simonds Industrial Branch
« Reply #394 on: January 09, 2013, 06:32:56 PM »
0

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 32945
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5336
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Amoskeag Northern - Simonds Industrial Branch
« Reply #395 on: January 09, 2013, 07:31:39 PM »
0


Yeah, what he gestured!

It is really amazing how a color selection makes a huge difference. It makes or breaks a scene (even if the item in question is a simple Kato bridge)!
. . . 42 . . .

central.vermont

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2623
  • Gender: Male
  • Jon
  • Respect: +147
Re: Amoskeag Northern - Simonds Industrial Branch
« Reply #396 on: January 09, 2013, 07:45:18 PM »
0
Now that one rock in the river just visible under the bridge.......has gotta go. It just doesn't look right.  :D

Just bust 'em, looking really good Ian!!  :D

Jon

eric220

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3714
  • Gender: Male
  • Continuing my abomination unto history
  • Respect: +623
    • The Modern PRR
Re: Amoskeag Northern - Simonds Industrial Branch
« Reply #397 on: January 09, 2013, 08:24:10 PM »
0
Now that one rock in the river just visible under the bridge.......has gotta go. It just doesn't look right.  :D

Just bust 'em, looking really good Ian!!  :D

Jon


I dunno, that semi-sized sharpie and house-sized paintbrush are kind of spoiling it for me.  :trollface:
-Eric

Modeling a transcontinental PRR
http://www.pennsylvania-railroad.com

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 10864
  • Respect: +2416
Re: Amoskeag Northern - Simonds Industrial Branch
« Reply #398 on: January 09, 2013, 08:28:04 PM »
0
I dunno, that semi-sized sharpie and house-sized paintbrush are kind of spoiling it for me.  :trollface:

I've heard of "a fork in the road", but never scissors.  :P
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

alcors110

  • Posts: 17
  • Respect: 0
Re: Amoskeag Northern - Simonds Industrial Branch
« Reply #399 on: January 09, 2013, 08:55:09 PM »
0
what a difference some paint can make. great looking scene!

Dave Schneider

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2377
  • Respect: +51
Re: Amoskeag Northern - Simonds Industrial Branch
« Reply #400 on: January 09, 2013, 08:57:01 PM »
0
Now that one rock in the river just visible under the bridge.......has gotta go. It just doesn't look right.  :D


As a geologist, I can confirm that having one big rock sticking out of the middle of a river has been observed in the prototype.

Big improvement on the stand-in bridge....and I mean that sincerely, without the slightest bit of sarcasm or snark!  Is there an emoticon for sincerity?

Best wishes, Dave
If you lend someone $20, and never see that person again, it was probably worth it.

GaryHinshaw

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6343
  • Respect: +1869
Re: Amoskeag Northern - Simonds Industrial Branch
« Reply #401 on: January 09, 2013, 08:58:44 PM »
0
The bridge looks much better now.  I'd still go with a through girder if it were me though.   :ashat:

Is there an emoticon for sincerity?

:tommann:

conrail98

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1456
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +41
Re: Amoskeag Northern - Simonds Industrial Branch
« Reply #402 on: January 10, 2013, 07:29:27 AM »
0
Ok so here is where we are at so far

From this:


To this:


It looks great Ian but one thing did just jump out at me. Are the signals on the wrong side of the bridge? Wouldn't it be safter to have them on the opposite side so viewing isn't blocked by the truss? This may need to be a girder so the FRA doesn't start writing violations,

Phil
- Phil

mcjaco

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1714
  • Respect: +110
Re: Amoskeag Northern - Simonds Industrial Branch
« Reply #403 on: January 10, 2013, 11:00:54 AM »
0
It is really amazing how a color selection makes a huge difference. It makes or breaks a scene (even if the item in question is a simple Kato bridge)!

Exactly.  I found the red bridge to be distracting to the structures behind it.  My eyes went to the bridge and stopped.  Not only does the black move my eyes past the bridge towards the buildings (and what is a great little scene back there), but the whole thing looks more believable to me. 

I'm with DKS, I'd leave the bridge. Maybe had some truss rods, to "Mericanize" it.  Build the CVS bridge at a later date.  Great work Ian!
~ Matt

eric220

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3714
  • Gender: Male
  • Continuing my abomination unto history
  • Respect: +623
    • The Modern PRR
Re: Amoskeag Northern - Simonds Industrial Branch
« Reply #404 on: January 10, 2013, 11:25:35 AM »
0
It looks great Ian but one thing did just jump out at me. Are the signals on the wrong side of the bridge? Wouldn't it be safter to have them on the opposite side so viewing isn't blocked by the truss? This may need to be a girder so the FRA doesn't start writing violations,

Phil

That's what cab signals are for.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2013, 09:10:50 PM by eric220 »
-Eric

Modeling a transcontinental PRR
http://www.pennsylvania-railroad.com