0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
It's not just about getting people to work assembling small parts for $10 bucks an hour. It's keeping trained, motivated people and replacing the majority of those same people when they move on. In todays labor market, that might be a little easier than it was before 2007. Then it was darn near impossible. Constantly training new people adds alot to the cost because you spend alot of resources to hire and train them and productivity suffers until they are up too speed, thereby driving up costs further. MTL seems to have figured it out somewhat and I commend them for it.
Gentlemen, the pendulum swings both ways. When the market decides that the price is too much then product will sit on shelves until the price drops. If I were a manufacturer today I would be doing a lot of planning to decide on how I will survive because invariably when markets get out of kilter with supply and demand and need correction that correction involves the loss of suppliers and only those whose operating model is the most economical will survive.
We are talking about toy trains, not the auto industry, TV's or appliances. Quit trying to apply global economics to model trains, it just doesn't work.
Point well made.The model railroad market is not a commodity market. It's more like a "luxury" market, where a different set of rules apply.
Joe, if anything good has come from all of this its that MTL is in a much better position than any other n scale company. I have been buying more MTL products lately because the price is about the same as everyone else and they ae available when everyone else has delays. The CSX 50 box from last year is a perfect example.I think some of the frustration you see from modelers towards MTL is that is not only represents n scale, but what's left of American industry. We see serious prototypes from China and president cars from our only American supplier. I really like the new hopper and I can't wait for the CR OCS observation when it eventually comes. i think MTL is finally going the right direction. now how about them 19k corn tanks or pd5k hoppers?Eh, I have to stop using my phone to type.
So the rules of supply and demand do not apply to "luxury" markets?????? Wow! And here I just read where RV sales were down due to the price of fuel. RV's, now there's a commodity for ya.
But make no mistake this is not about those of us that are in the hobby. Its about those who aren't in the hobby and quite probably won't be unless this hobby becomes more affordable.
You see while you can still fit about four times as much into a given area in N scale than HO it will cost more to do it. And HO stuff is not priced four times higher than N.
China can respond in half that time (if they aren't trying to stiff you) because of the unlimited work force they can throw at it.
Ink, you are correct that it's about the future modellers as much as the old guard. Price is important to them but they don;t necessarily look at a $20 car as to expensive. Below $20 the generally don't car. $20-30 they might think about it, but if they really want it or it's just a cool scheme, they buy it. Over $30 and it get's alot tougher....to a non-purchase. Who's to know in 10 more years, but I'll bet that will cheat up a bit.
This is something that most people haven't addressed. The old gaurd may remember $3 Atlas cars and $20 loco's but the new customer has no expectations of a price range.
Tony hit the nail on the head.New people do not have anywhere near the pricing expectations that we old-timers do.