0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The #4s lead to simpler geometry and accurate track spacing (the inside passing siding is 9 3/4") so I would proably revert to the original plan I posted with only the x-over replacing the 2 pairs of 4s on the main.
@DKS, yes, like that... But not sure if there's more play value in having the x-over on the depot side (locos coming out of the pit) or the rear like it is now.
The grade crossing is a key feature to the scene. It's also an element my son wants to retain. So maybe it does stay in back. I may have to keep playing with it. Too bad I can't save these files without paying $50 for the license!
Dave, is the pit track now a #4? That's OK if it is.
Awesome! Other than cost savings, I wonder if the #6 on the siding gets me anything. Looks as if the track spacing is wider.
Dave .. try the atlas C65 track .. BANTRAK used it on our last raffle layout .. it works really well, and as an added benefit, it wouldn't be hard to connect it to Enola .. plus cheaper
If you gotta do it, you gotta do it, but I don't like the double crossover. You can only get from the outer to inner loop in one spot and will make run-arounds more difficult as you will have to circumnavigate an entire loop to get around the train on the outer loop, as opposed to running around on a "passing siding" and only having to go halfway around.
Paul,Thanks for the awesome pictures! I downloaded them for future reference if that's OK. We loved Apex and it's high on my wish list for retirement locations post-Air Force. I'd be very interested in seeing pictures of your project.Are you scratchbuilding the Apex station? We decided we were OK with the Walthers Pella depot as a decent stand-in with white trim and a light gray roof.@DKS, yes, like that... But not sure if there's more play value in having the x-over on the depot side (locos coming out of the pit) or the rear like it is now.