Author Topic: Planning a layout for my son  (Read 33238 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

DKS

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 13424
  • Respect: +7026
Re: Planning a layout for my son
« Reply #15 on: November 17, 2010, 11:24:45 AM »
0
The #4s lead to simpler geometry and accurate track spacing (the inside passing siding is 9 3/4") so I would proably revert to the original plan I posted with only the x-over replacing the 2 pairs of 4s on the main.

So... like this?


Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11226
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9337
Re: Planning a layout for my son
« Reply #16 on: November 17, 2010, 11:27:04 AM »
0
Paul,

Thanks for the awesome pictures!  I downloaded them for future reference if that's OK.  We loved Apex and it's high on my wish list for retirement locations post-Air Force.  I'd be very interested in seeing pictures of your project.

Are you scratchbuilding the Apex station?  We decided we were OK with the Walthers Pella depot as a decent stand-in with white trim and a light gray roof.


@DKS, yes, like that...  But not sure if there's more play value in having the x-over on the depot side (locos coming out of the pit) or the rear like it is now.

DKS

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 13424
  • Respect: +7026
Re: Planning a layout for my son
« Reply #17 on: November 17, 2010, 11:28:28 AM »
0
@DKS, yes, like that...  But not sure if there's more play value in having the x-over on the depot side (locos coming out of the pit) or the rear like it is now.

Yes, that's a good question. Hadn't looked at it from that angle, but it does create a space crunch to put it along the front. Won't fit with the #6 on the pit siding, at least if the grade xing remains intact.

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11226
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9337
Re: Planning a layout for my son
« Reply #18 on: November 17, 2010, 11:31:39 AM »
0
The grade crossing is a key feature to the scene.  It's also an element my son wants to retain.  So maybe it does stay in back.  I may have to keep playing with it.  Too bad I can't save these files without paying $50 for the license!

DKS

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 13424
  • Respect: +7026
Re: Planning a layout for my son
« Reply #19 on: November 17, 2010, 11:35:15 AM »
0
The grade crossing is a key feature to the scene.  It's also an element my son wants to retain.  So maybe it does stay in back.  I may have to keep playing with it.  Too bad I can't save these files without paying $50 for the license!

I got you covered. It literally takes less than a minute to render one of these.



« Last Edit: November 17, 2010, 11:36:47 AM by David K. Smith »

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11226
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9337
Re: Planning a layout for my son
« Reply #20 on: November 17, 2010, 11:36:58 AM »
0
Dave, is the pit track now a #4?  That's OK if it is.  The second image is dead-on!

DKS

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 13424
  • Respect: +7026
Re: Planning a layout for my son
« Reply #21 on: November 17, 2010, 11:38:12 AM »
0
Dave, is the pit track now a #4?  That's OK if it is.

Yes, the pit TO is #4. The only #6 left is on the siding, upper right.

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11226
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9337
Re: Planning a layout for my son
« Reply #22 on: November 17, 2010, 11:42:11 AM »
0
Awesome!  Other than cost savings, I wonder if the #6 on the siding gets me anything.  Looks as if the track spacing is wider.

Thanks for all your help, by the way.

DKS

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 13424
  • Respect: +7026
Re: Planning a layout for my son
« Reply #23 on: November 17, 2010, 11:46:58 AM »
0
Awesome!  Other than cost savings, I wonder if the #6 on the siding gets me anything.  Looks as if the track spacing is wider.

The track spacing can be changed by using a different return curve piece.



This is why you can use #6s for the switches on the inside passing siding; you just can't use 6s for crossovers. This plan has no #4s at all:

« Last Edit: November 17, 2010, 11:59:39 AM by David K. Smith »

John

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 13389
  • Respect: +3255
Re: Planning a layout for my son
« Reply #24 on: November 17, 2010, 12:06:12 PM »
0
Dave .. try the atlas C65 track .. BANTRAK used it on our last raffle layout .. it works really well, and as an added benefit, it wouldn't be hard to connect it to Enola :) .. plus cheaper

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11226
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9337
Re: Planning a layout for my son
« Reply #25 on: November 17, 2010, 12:11:01 PM »
0
Dave .. try the atlas C65 track .. BANTRAK used it on our last raffle layout .. it works really well, and as an added benefit, it wouldn't be hard to connect it to Enola :) .. plus cheaper

John,

I already have most of the Unitrack.  Jacob had a set come with it and we bought the inner loop set.  I also had some from my Broadway Limited set as well as some leftovers from a track replacement I did inside the tunnel.  Originally I was going to make this a set of T-Trak modules, so that was the thinking.  Later on I figured a small, self-contained layout would be better.

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11675
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +6801
Re: Planning a layout for my son
« Reply #26 on: November 17, 2010, 12:35:46 PM »
0
If you gotta do it, you gotta do it, but I don't like the double crossover.  You can only get from the outer to inner loop in one spot and will make run-arounds more difficult as you will have to circumnavigate an entire loop to get around the train on the outer loop, as opposed to running around on a "passing siding" and only having to go halfway around.

HTH,
DFF

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!

DKS

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 13424
  • Respect: +7026
Re: Planning a layout for my son
« Reply #27 on: November 17, 2010, 12:54:07 PM »
0
If you gotta do it, you gotta do it, but I don't like the double crossover.  You can only get from the outer to inner loop in one spot and will make run-arounds more difficult as you will have to circumnavigate an entire loop to get around the train on the outer loop, as opposed to running around on a "passing siding" and only having to go halfway around.

I see the xover really as just a way to get back and forth between outer and inner mains. The inner main still has the passing siding where all of the switching action would take place, while something else is doing laps on the outer main. If that something else needs to do some switching, then it gets swapped with whatever is on the inner main. Also... bear in mind the intended user--I could be wrong (I usually am), but don't think Jacob will be too worried about the reduced switching options all that much.

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11226
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9337
Re: Planning a layout for my son
« Reply #28 on: November 17, 2010, 12:59:05 PM »
0
I'll talk to Jacob when he gets home from school.  I'm actually at home with the movers as they pack up the house (again).  He's actually pretty astute when it comes to observing real railroad practice.  He may prefer the single crossovers.  I'm going to present him both options without mentioning my preferences.

Jacob enjoys switching...  He's actually "operated" the Juniata Division more than I have.

The next decision is whether to go DCC.  I'm inclined to just because running two trains in DCC is so much easier to wire than multiple block operation, unless I go super-simple, i.e., the outer track would be one block all the inner trackage another, each with its own cab.  prefer DCC as the option, but also want to be affordable.

160pennsy

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 372
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +183
Re: Planning a layout for my son
« Reply #29 on: November 17, 2010, 01:03:18 PM »
0
Paul,

Thanks for the awesome pictures!  I downloaded them for future reference if that's OK.  We loved Apex and it's high on my wish list for retirement locations post-Air Force.  I'd be very interested in seeing pictures of your project.

Are you scratchbuilding the Apex station?  We decided we were OK with the Walthers Pella depot as a decent stand-in with white trim and a light gray roof.


@DKS, yes, like that...  But not sure if there's more play value in having the x-over on the depot side (locos coming out of the pit) or the rear like it is now.


Dave,

I uploaded the whole series of Apex photos to my Picassa album for your use if needed (see link below). Not sure which club member signed up to build or kitbash the Apex station but if I see any progress on this building I'll forward some shots. Pending the outcome of the asphalt transfer plant build, I might volunteer for the CSX depot/yard office. Will post some in-progress photos after I get further along with construction.

http://picasaweb.google.com/pohegyi/ApexNCRR?authkey=Gv1sRgCKqVnL2ayOX3HA&feat=directlink.

Paul Ohegyi
Current Member
https://nrmrc.org/