Author Topic: Best Of Notes on body-mount couplers (work-in-progress)  (Read 111757 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

GaryHinshaw

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6344
  • Respect: +1869
Re: Notes on body-mount couplers (work-in-progress)
« Reply #420 on: September 05, 2018, 02:09:36 AM »
+1
It depends on one's idea of 'snuff'.... 

Well, trucks & couplers at least, just like N scale.  ;)

Here's a car that has been in my Unfinished Projects box for longer than I care to admit: an Intermountain 60' flat car that someone carelessly left out on the main line:



(Sorry about the distracting backdrop artifacts.)  These cars are slightly high riders out of the box (and the couplers are too high - go figure), but they are easy to lower with BLMA trucks and LEZ couplers:





The etched pockets work really well in this conversion.  (The weathering is really only intended to satisfy the 1-2' rule, not the 4" rule, like that last shot...  :|)

tom mann

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 10917
  • Representing The Railwire on The Railwire
  • Respect: +1014
    • http://www.chicagoswitching.com
Re: Notes on body-mount couplers (work-in-progress)
« Reply #421 on: September 05, 2018, 07:24:35 AM »
+1
That’s really great looking Gary.  I wouldn’t have expected that car to get that low.

Did you print the background on adding machine tape? :D

ednadolski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4811
  • Respect: +1756
Re: Notes on body-mount couplers (work-in-progress)
« Reply #422 on: September 05, 2018, 09:52:13 AM »
0
That lowered car looks fantastic!  8)

Ed

Smike

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 819
  • Respect: +196
Re: Notes on body-mount couplers (work-in-progress)
« Reply #423 on: September 05, 2018, 10:11:15 AM »
0
/>

That never gets old...

So is the latest run of IM flats a re-run?  They look really nice.

GaryHinshaw

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6344
  • Respect: +1869
Re: Notes on body-mount couplers (work-in-progress)
« Reply #424 on: September 05, 2018, 01:00:49 PM »
0
Thanks guys.

Smike, the weathered OTTX car is from an early run of the flats, the HTTX is from the latest run.  Sadly the new run has some assembly issues: the sides are overlays glued to the metal deck and 2 of the 3 I received have some sags in the corners.  You can see that in the HTTX car in this shot (before I weathered the OTTX car):



I might have to break a glue joint to fix it.  I would recommend inspecting before purchase, if at all possible.

Did you print the background on adding machine tape? :D

I know, right?  :P  Just a really old test print from my struggling inkjet.  To be replaced, eventually.

Smike

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 819
  • Respect: +196
Re: Notes on body-mount couplers (work-in-progress)
« Reply #425 on: September 05, 2018, 01:41:21 PM »
0
Thanks Gary, a little disappointing on the current run, its hard to get motivated to purchase higher end rolling stock that needs fixing.  Great work on the weathering.

Peter Amling

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 151
  • Respect: +18
Re: Notes on body-mount couplers (work-in-progress)
« Reply #426 on: July 02, 2019, 09:46:14 PM »
0
@GaryHinshaw I love the weathering you're doing to these models, particularly on the wheels. Are you painting the inside of the wheels brown? Do you have a method for doing so? And what color of paint do you use? I assume you're using BLMA or FVM wheels?

GaryHinshaw

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6344
  • Respect: +1869
Re: Notes on body-mount couplers (work-in-progress)
« Reply #427 on: July 03, 2019, 02:18:29 AM »
0
Thank you Peter.  You ask an excellent question regarding colour: I couldn't remember and I thought I had written it down, but obviously not in this thread.  I found a Weekend Update post from last year though where I described the process:

https://www.therailwire.net/forum/index.php?topic=45252.msg586422#msg586422

Hope this helps,
Gary

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11030
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +606
Re: Notes on body-mount couplers (work-in-progress)
« Reply #428 on: July 18, 2019, 06:35:28 PM »
0
Crap, now I know these ride a little high. :facepalm:


BCR 570

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2227
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3796
    • BCR Dawson Creek Subdivision in N Scale
Re: Notes on body-mount couplers (work-in-progress)
« Reply #429 on: August 05, 2019, 02:04:27 PM »
+2
I am very late to this party but after experiencing continued issues with Micro-Trains couplers, I wanted to give this a try.  Gary kindly provided me with half a dozen sets of couplers and etchings to experiment with:




De-fretting and cleaning up the parts was straight forward:




Folding the etched parts also went well, and they fit together well:




Soldering the lids on was more of a challenge, in particular trying to limit the heat build-up, hold the pocket still, and limit the amount of solder.  I settled on a method of holding the parts in a heat sink and used as little flux and solder as possible.  my 35 watt iron may be too big a weapon for this and a smaller 12 watt iron might be more appropriate.  After filing away the excess solder, this is what I have:




The couplers seem to fit in alright:




I made a styrene jig for establishing a standard mounting height:




This told me that for the Atlas Hart ballast cars, I needed a .020" shim.  One problem I encountered was that the etched box was too long and had to be trimmed short to clear the bolster; specifically the tab and slot extending off the rear.  At this point I realized that my etched parts were longer than the assembled sample Gary gave me, so I guess there are different versions of the etching.  Trimming the tab and slot was actually a benefit as once the slot was open at the rear end, the screw could be mounted onto the car, the coupler box slid underneath the head, and the screw then tightened to secure the coupler.  Here is the coupler underneath the car:




This top view shows that the coupler is too far out from the end of the car, as I used an existing hole:




This photograph shows a car on the left with my original MT 905 fit, and the car with my first FT fit on the right:




I selected these cars because the MT 905s do not stay coupled and have been a source of frustration.  My next step is to equip all five ballast cars with the FTs and undertake some road tests, including my next op sessions to obtain some feedback from operators.


Tim




T. Horton
North Vancouver, B.C.
BCR Dawson Creek Subdivision in N Scale
www.bcrdawsonsub.ca
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3MbxkZkx7zApSYCHqu2IYQ

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 32948
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5338
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Notes on body-mount couplers (work-in-progress)
« Reply #430 on: August 05, 2019, 02:19:12 PM »
0

I selected these cars because the MT 905s do not stay coupled and have been a source of frustration.  My next step is to equip all five ballast cars with the FTs and undertake some road tests, including my next op sessions to obtain some feedback from operators.


The car with MTL 905 looks pretty good to me.  Have you tried to figure out why they don't stay coupled, but didn't arrive at any meaningful fix?
. . . 42 . . .

BCR 570

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2227
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +3796
    • BCR Dawson Creek Subdivision in N Scale
Re: Notes on body-mount couplers (work-in-progress)
« Reply #431 on: August 05, 2019, 06:56:49 PM »
0
The 905s look good and were a solution for cars where it was not possible to mount a full size coupler at the correct height.  Unfortunately they have been very unreliable in operation, frequently letting go during switching back and forth.  I have not been able to determine the cause; they do need to be centered exactly or they won't work at all.

Tim
T. Horton
North Vancouver, B.C.
BCR Dawson Creek Subdivision in N Scale
www.bcrdawsonsub.ca
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3MbxkZkx7zApSYCHqu2IYQ

Iain

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4661
  • Gender: Female
  • Na sgrìobhaidh a Iain
  • Respect: +385
    • The Best Puppers
Re: Notes on body-mount couplers (work-in-progress)
« Reply #432 on: August 05, 2019, 07:46:25 PM »
0
@GaryHinshaw Do your etched pockets work for MT Truescale couplers?
I like ducks

ednadolski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4811
  • Respect: +1756
Re: Notes on body-mount couplers (work-in-progress)
« Reply #433 on: August 05, 2019, 10:25:51 PM »
0
Unfortunately they have been very unreliable in operation, frequently letting go during switching back and forth.  I have not been able to determine the cause ...

It's not a bug, it's a feature: your switching moves are emulating the way the couplers were designed to work in automatic  "hands free" operation:

Time: 59 seconds:
/>
Time: 6m 53s:
/>
By design, the couplers can separate whenever the they are not directly in line and the slack runs. You don't need a magnet if the cars are on a curve.  I've had those unwanted separations occur often (and quite repeatably) under the right conditions (downgrade on a curve, in a slow moving train).

Ed

ednadolski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4811
  • Respect: +1756
Re: Notes on body-mount couplers (work-in-progress)
« Reply #434 on: August 05, 2019, 10:26:29 PM »
0
Do your etched pockets work for MT Truescale couplers?

No, they do not fit.

Ed