0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Robbman on May 17, 2010, 01:56:31 PMQuote from: ljudice on May 17, 2010, 01:26:50 PMI heard that almost the entire ex-Conrail rebuild fleet of coal porters is sidelined due to some sort of mechanical problem - like the tubs falling out - which is why CSX is badly short of hoppers.NS has pretty much all of theirs stored as well... they won't pass the inspection needed for life extension.It was one class, the G52X or the G52R. Apparently they have problems with the center sill cracking.
Quote from: ljudice on May 17, 2010, 01:26:50 PMI heard that almost the entire ex-Conrail rebuild fleet of coal porters is sidelined due to some sort of mechanical problem - like the tubs falling out - which is why CSX is badly short of hoppers.NS has pretty much all of theirs stored as well... they won't pass the inspection needed for life extension.
I heard that almost the entire ex-Conrail rebuild fleet of coal porters is sidelined due to some sort of mechanical problem - like the tubs falling out - which is why CSX is badly short of hoppers.
To answer my own question:Original arrangement:http://drolsen.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=2049807Sounds like they were a PS/Alcoa experiment?
Ouch! I didn't realize it was all of em.That really sucks (for NS).
The PS4000's look pretty close - with some changes to the roof. The tough part will be painting - as these cars always looked black to me - but they are not - Aluminum cars seem to develop very distinctive weathering patterns.
One of the reasons that the Alcoa hoppers looks so stocky is because of what they haul. Bauxite, the mineral used to make aluminum, is a clay-like substance and is a bit on the dense side. While I have seen CSX and NS 100T covered hoppers formerly used for grain in the same sort of service in the past I imagine that they were not filled to their full capacity because of the weight involved...