0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
The problem with moving the bolsters outboard is...you would have to have 48" radius curves so that the trucks didn't hit the stirrups. I think that is a compromise in our scale dating to the 9-3/4" era.
And the BLMA correct in every dimension trucks should be narrower anyway.
Appearsto be room for an entepreneur to make a killing with a variety of replacement bolsters...
Quote from: TiVoPrince on March 26, 2010, 08:31:38 AMAppearsto be room for an entepreneur to make a killing with a variety of replacement bolsters...I understand Craig is planning that as a supplement to his new body-mount coupler line. :Ok, now I'm a pathological liar. But cripe, he does owe it to us since he released such fine trucks w/o couplers.
Quote from: GaryHinshaw on March 26, 2010, 01:39:12 PMQuote from: TiVoPrince on March 26, 2010, 08:31:38 AMAppearsto be room for an entepreneur to make a killing with a variety of replacement bolsters...I understand Craig is planning that as a supplement to his new body-mount coupler line. :Ok, now I'm a pathological liar. But cripe, he does owe it to us since he released such fine trucks w/o couplers. :-*
I think it would look even better if you moved the bolster closer to the ends like it's supposed to be! Compare to the photo of 92000 that you posted.
Quote from: Skibbe on March 25, 2010, 07:54:26 AMI think it would look even better if you moved the bolster closer to the ends like it's supposed to be! Compare to the photo of 92000 that you posted. Upon review, I don't think the bolsters need to be moved.see this:http://www.nwhs.org/archivesdb/thumbs/photos/NW02646.jpg