Author Topic: PRR/Conrail Juniata Division Engineering Report  (Read 331938 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11193
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9184
Re: PRR/Conrail Juniata Division Engineering Report
« Reply #780 on: January 31, 2013, 06:00:05 PM »
0
Unbelievable Pennsy awesomeness arrived for the Juniata Division today.  All my coal drags will soon have proper power.  It will still need DCC, but I'm thinking about doing sound:



The I1sa class was equipped with Banshee single-chime whistles when built, but some research indicates that most, in fact, received standard 3-chime whistles by the 1950s.

I've been rounding up quotes for DCC install and sound, and they're all pretty crippling, so she may not see service for a while yet.

eric220

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3714
  • Gender: Male
  • Continuing my abomination unto history
  • Respect: +623
    • The Modern PRR
Re: PRR/Conrail Juniata Division Engineering Report
« Reply #781 on: January 31, 2013, 06:09:19 PM »
0
I've been rounding up quotes for DCC install and sound, and they're all pretty crippling, so she may not see service for a while yet.

I'm very sorry that she's not going to work out for you. I'd be happy to help you out and give her a good home!  :trollface:

Very nice lokie.
-Eric

Modeling a transcontinental PRR
http://www.pennsylvania-railroad.com

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11675
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +6800
Re: PRR/Conrail Juniata Division Engineering Report
« Reply #782 on: January 31, 2013, 06:25:57 PM »
0
Dave,

I think sound in this particular locomotive, considering all of its Pennsy awesomeness, would be appropriate.  It will likely be worth the wait to do it up right.

It's definitely a beautiful model, but can you do something about the distance between the engine and tender?  That gap is an eyesore to me.  I know the curves on the Juniata Division aren't particularly wide, but I bet there's plenty of room to close that gap somewhat and still clear your tightest curve.

DFF

Member: ACL/SAL Historical Society
Member: Wilmington & Western RR
A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11193
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9184
Re: PRR/Conrail Juniata Division Engineering Report
« Reply #783 on: January 31, 2013, 06:30:56 PM »
0
Dave,

I think sound in this particular locomotive, considering all of its Pennsy awesomeness, would be appropriate.  It will likely be worth the wait to do it up right.

It's definitely a beautiful model, but can you do something about the distance between the engine and tender?  That gap is an eyesore to me.  I know the curves on the Juniata Division aren't particularly wide, but I bet there's plenty of room to close that gap somewhat and still clear your tightest curve.

DFF

The drawbar has two holes...  This is the maximum coupling distance; there's another that's closer.

eric220

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3714
  • Gender: Male
  • Continuing my abomination unto history
  • Respect: +623
    • The Modern PRR
Re: PRR/Conrail Juniata Division Engineering Report
« Reply #784 on: January 31, 2013, 06:37:31 PM »
0
Dave, in a more serious comment, I've got a thought about sound.  I'm holding off on sound in my PRR locomotives for now.  With QSI's announcement of the Titan Micro, and knowing that they've got all the sound sets from the BLI HO stuff, I'm hoping that the stars will align and we'll soon have access proper proto sound sets for our K's, Q's, T's, I's, L's, etc.  Unfortunately, for now price and delivery are TBD.
-Eric

Modeling a transcontinental PRR
http://www.pennsylvania-railroad.com

Bob Bufkin

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6397
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +44
Re: PRR/Conrail Juniata Division Engineering Report
« Reply #785 on: January 31, 2013, 08:06:52 PM »
0
With that short tender you are going to have to stop at water plugs more often. 

Mine has the banshee whistle which under certain conditions can sent a chill down your spine.  Have you run it in non DCC mode to check how it tracks around your curves?

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11193
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9184
Re: PRR/Conrail Juniata Division Engineering Report
« Reply #786 on: January 31, 2013, 08:08:45 PM »
0
With that short tender you are going to have to stop at water plugs more often. 

Mine has the banshee whistle which under certain conditions can sent a chill down your spine.  Have you run it in non DCC mode to check how it tracks around your curves?

I ran it on Jacob's layout which is DC...  It handled the 13.5" curve just fine, which is the minimum radius on the Juniata Division.

Chris333

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 18328
  • Respect: +5631
Re: PRR/Conrail Juniata Division Engineering Report
« Reply #787 on: January 31, 2013, 08:33:36 PM »
0
PCM?

 :trollface:

Hornwrecker

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 401
  • Respect: +25
Re: PRR/Conrail Juniata Division Engineering Report
« Reply #788 on: January 31, 2013, 08:42:31 PM »
0
Noice DEC!  You need more. They ran in packs.

I just got a copy of Triumph VII, and it seems like half the photos in it are of Decs.  One thing mentioned in it was that when they were pushing in pairs, they paired one short and one long haul together, since they never had enough long hauls, so that the short could dog it when it started running low on water.  One pic showed two short tender decs with a tank car for water between them.

If they came out with an affordable, good running one - DCC ready, I'd probably go back a decade on my layout, as well as spending way too much $.
Bob

chicken45

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4500
  • Gender: Male
  • Will rim for upvotes.
  • Respect: +1013
    • Facebook Profile
Re: PRR/Conrail Juniata Division Engineering Report
« Reply #789 on: January 31, 2013, 10:28:21 PM »
0
Noice DEC!  You need more. They ran in packs.

I just got a copy of Triumph VII, and it seems like half the photos in it are of Decs.  One thing mentioned in it was that when they were pushing in pairs, they paired one short and one long haul together, since they never had enough long hauls, so that the short could dog it when it started running low on water.  One pic showed two short tender decs with a tank car for water between them.

If they came out with an affordable, good running one - DCC ready, I'd probably go back a decade on my layout, as well as spending way too much $.

The next time he sees more than one come up for auction at the same time, I'm sure he'll get right on that!  :trollface:
Josh Surkosky

Here's a Clerihew about Ed. K.

Ed Kapucinski
Every night, he plants a new tree.
But mention his law
and you've pulled your last straw!

Alternate version:
Ed Kapucinski
Every night, he plants a new tree.
He asks excitedly "Did you say Ménage à Trois?"
No, I said "Ed's Law."

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11193
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9184
Re: PRR/Conrail Juniata Division Engineering Report
« Reply #790 on: January 31, 2013, 10:42:06 PM »
0
I've been purchasing brass locomotives at the rate of one every 10 years...    :trollface:

conrailthomas519

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 341
  • Gender: Male
  • BNSF / Montana Rail Link
  • Respect: +11
Re: PRR/Conrail Juniata Division Engineering Report
« Reply #791 on: January 31, 2013, 10:42:54 PM »
0
Dave,
Awesome Loco, very Nice! ... looks like it needs ummm?? alittle something,  oh yeah Coal in that tender and a whole lot of weathering! Thats the ticket
TMM

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11193
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +9184
Re: PRR/Conrail Juniata Division Engineering Report
« Reply #792 on: February 01, 2013, 08:20:40 AM »
0
Seusscaboose brought up a very important point...  The shorts and stalls associated with brass will create havoc with a sound decoder.  I still have momentary shorts in turnouts with my brass K4.  Instead if sound in this beast, perhaps I do sound in a Bachmann H-class bash using a Superturbine casting and do standard DCC for the I1sa.  TCS Keep Alive looks attractive, if only it were N scale.

Bob Bufkin

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6397
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +44
Re: PRR/Conrail Juniata Division Engineering Report
« Reply #793 on: February 01, 2013, 08:31:14 AM »
0
Seusscaboose brought up a very important point...  The shorts and stalls associated with brass will create havoc with a sound decoder.  I still have momentary shorts in turnouts with my brass K4.  Instead if sound in this beast, perhaps I do sound in a Bachmann H-class bash using a Superturbine casting and do standard DCC for the I1sa.  TCS Keep Alive looks attractive, if only it were N scale.
He should know from experience for when I had my Il running on his layout.  Two feet and stall, etc.

chicken45

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4500
  • Gender: Male
  • Will rim for upvotes.
  • Respect: +1013
    • Facebook Profile
Re: PRR/Conrail Juniata Division Engineering Report
« Reply #794 on: February 01, 2013, 08:35:04 AM »
0
Seusscaboose brought up a very important point...  The shorts and stalls associated with brass will create havoc with a sound decoder.  I still have momentary shorts in turnouts with my brass K4.  Instead if sound in this beast, perhaps I do sound in a Bachmann H-class bash using a Superturbine casting and do standard DCC for the I1sa.  TCS Keep Alive looks attractive, if only it were N scale.

Since I never owned brass locos, can you go in to detail on this?
Josh Surkosky

Here's a Clerihew about Ed. K.

Ed Kapucinski
Every night, he plants a new tree.
But mention his law
and you've pulled your last straw!

Alternate version:
Ed Kapucinski
Every night, he plants a new tree.
He asks excitedly "Did you say Ménage à Trois?"
No, I said "Ed's Law."