0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Puddington on June 12, 2009, 03:30:46 PMRobb: I don't have any hard figures myself but an LHS owner I know very well confirmed to me that the figure he mentioned in the rsponse was about right for true cost, in his experience. If it were for a fully assembled and packaged car with an underframe and MT trucks, then that $6.14US unit cost would be better... but it's just the shell.
Robb: I don't have any hard figures myself but an LHS owner I know very well confirmed to me that the figure he mentioned in the rsponse was about right for true cost, in his experience.
Will the shell work with an Atlas underframe ($1.00) and Atlas trucks ($4.85)? Would this cure the ride height problem?Bob.
Somehow I don't understand why this company is getting a free pass. They make a mistake, and they charge to correct it?I'd love to see the outrage if General Motors put defective brakes on a car, then charged to fix them.I'm so glad I'm not into buying model railroad equipment anymore.
BTW, I'm not sure what alternate universe you live in, but automotive manufacturers "get away" with defective components and inferior products all the time.
More strange Canadian National finds:Looking through my photo collection and Fallen Flags, the vast majority of the CN newsprint cars that match the TLT bodystyle do, in fact have "Canadian Natiional" in english only!
Quote from: daniel_leavitt2000 on June 14, 2009, 10:55:37 PMMore strange Canadian National finds:Looking through my photo collection and Fallen Flags, the vast majority of the CN newsprint cars that match the TLT bodystyle do, in fact have "Canadian Natiional" in english only! Can you positively confirm it's on both sides?
Personally I don't feel that you can compare GM to True Line Trains on any level. Just not the same playing field. However, TLT promised us a prototype model like we had never before seen in N Scale and they charged a premium price for them and then delivered a pile of crap. Some of us, myself included, purchased these items sight unseen with the trust that the product would be what was promised. That was not the case in some of their cars. So, I don't actually see why anyone who has paid good money, and a lot of it, should have to pay one cent more to get what they were promised and paid for. I'm sorry, but at some point model train manufacturers have to take the high road and make good on their promises. These cars were in the production stage for a very long time and to have them released with these kinds of blaring errors is just not right. They had more than enough time to get the details right and they simply dropped the ball and now they want you to share in the expense of their failure. I say screw that. I think Kisatchie is right on with his assessment of the situation. Send them copies of your sales receipts and demand what you paid for. I think that is fair.