Author Topic: Best Of Tehachapi Layout research help wanted  (Read 35386 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ednadolski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4812
  • Respect: +1757
Re: Tehachapi Layout research help wanted
« Reply #60 on: August 05, 2009, 06:24:25 PM »
0
Thought folks might enjoy some pics of the (HO scale) La Mesa layout, with some (partly) finished scenery:







« Last Edit: August 05, 2009, 11:20:23 PM by ednadolski »

GaryHinshaw

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6344
  • Respect: +1869
Re: Tehachapi Layout research help wanted
« Reply #61 on: August 05, 2009, 10:14:42 PM »
0
I'm not seeing the picture Ed...  Links ok?

BTW, how's the layout going, Kiwi_BNSF?  You still here?  :-\

-Gary
« Last Edit: August 05, 2009, 10:18:35 PM by GaryHinshaw »

ednadolski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4812
  • Respect: +1757
Re: Tehachapi Layout research help wanted
« Reply #62 on: August 05, 2009, 10:20:05 PM »
0
Odd, it was working before but now I dont see it either.
(Seems maybe like some issue with the pbase server.)

Anyways here are the links:

http://i.pbase.com/o4/60/660360/1/102901389.Cy2HKJaI.HotatWalong.jpg
http://i.pbase.com/o4/60/660360/1/102901488.0qpYSVLj.BusyLoop.jpg
http://i.pbase.com/o4/60/660360/1/102901207.Lk8CE4sQ.OutofTunnel10.jpg

Or try these:

http://www.pbase.com/intermodal/image/102901389
http://www.pbase.com/intermodal/image/102901488
http://www.pbase.com/intermodal/image/102901207

Ed

PS -- Try the second group first, it looks like maybe my web browser was caching the .jpgs, but pbase doesn't like the direct link.
« Last Edit: August 05, 2009, 10:25:57 PM by ednadolski »

GaryHinshaw

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6344
  • Respect: +1869
Re: Tehachapi Layout research help wanted
« Reply #63 on: August 05, 2009, 10:37:27 PM »
0
Ok, that 2nd group of links works.  It's coming along very nicely!  I'll have to see it in person someday...  But I think they need to do better on those trees above T9. (Easy for me to say!)  I've got my eye on these oaks from SAMTrees:

http://www.samtrees.com/cchanpin4.asp?a_mingcheng=Oak%20Tree%20-%208101

ednadolski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4812
  • Respect: +1757
Re: Tehachapi Layout research help wanted
« Reply #64 on: August 05, 2009, 10:49:04 PM »
0


Those SamTrees look nice, but $ 12.65 USD for a 4" tree ...  :o

I don't have pics (yet), but I've been looking at the sagebrush trees from Petite Pines and they can be used to make acceptable oaks:

http://www.petitepinesnorthern.com/structurespage.htm

Assembly is pretty easy.

Ed


GaryHinshaw

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6344
  • Respect: +1869
Re: Tehachapi Layout research help wanted
« Reply #65 on: August 06, 2009, 12:39:11 AM »
0
Yea, the price is pretty dear, but I was thinking of ordering a few then trying to copy them. 

Another good source of sagebrush is Sweetwater Scenery.  They have a 10-pack of 3"-5" armatures for $20.95.  I haven't managed to get that nice airy look in the foiliage yet though - still more like cotton candy...   :(

-gfh

ednadolski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4812
  • Respect: +1757
Re: Tehachapi Layout research help wanted
« Reply #66 on: December 15, 2009, 10:44:04 AM »
0
Just thought I'd give this thread a bump -- anyone have any updates?

I have a few sagebrush type trees that are masquerading as tehachapi oaks, if anyone's interested I can post some pics.

Ed

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 10869
  • Respect: +2418
Re: Tehachapi Layout research help wanted
« Reply #67 on: December 15, 2009, 10:58:32 AM »
0
Bump is appreciated, but it's a shame I came to TRW a smidge too late to help with this. Didn't even know it was a topic, considering the Northeast bias I keep bumping into here.  ;D  Anyway, I grew-up in the area. (Heck... I was born in Mojave, a dubious distinction if there ever was one.) Many hours/days spent railfanning at Walong and Caliente, although that was late '60s to 1985 or so.

Nice to see folks talking about home.
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

Philip H

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8910
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1655
    • Layout Progress Blog
Re: Tehachapi Layout research help wanted
« Reply #68 on: December 15, 2009, 11:35:06 AM »
0
Just thought I'd give this thread a bump -- anyone have any updates?

I have a few sagebrush type trees that are masquerading as tehachapi oaks, if anyone's interested I can post some pics.

Ed
Yeah, I'd be interested.  I'm about to start scenery pahse one, and modeling south Louisiana I need lots of oak trees.  Would love to see what your Tehachipi's look like - doing live oaks in n scale has always been a bit of a bear to me.
Philip H.
Chief Everything Officer
Baton Rouge Southern RR - Mount Rainier Division.


ednadolski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4812
  • Respect: +1757
Re: Tehachapi Layout research help wanted
« Reply #69 on: December 22, 2009, 10:55:50 AM »
0
Here is a link to an awesome aerial view of the Loop, with an intermodal train right on the Loop, no less.

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=tehachapi+CA&sll=39.993596,-105.089706&sspn=0.123227,0.224361&t=k&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Tehachapi,+Kern,+California&ll=35.199254,-118.535866&spn=0.007969,0.014623&z=17

Be sure to zoom in -- you can even see the details on the cab roofs of the locos.

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 10869
  • Respect: +2418
Re: Tehachapi Layout research help wanted
« Reply #70 on: December 22, 2009, 11:02:16 AM »
0
Glad to see that Google finally ponied-up to buy the highest-res imaging for the area. They frustrated railfans all over the world for several years because everything between Mojave and Bakersfield was at their lowest res... which I don't understand because the click volume would have told them right away that it needed to be on their shopping list.  ::)
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

GaryHinshaw

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6344
  • Respect: +1869
Re: Tehachapi Layout research help wanted
« Reply #71 on: December 22, 2009, 12:51:46 PM »
0
Very nice.  And yet another train that won't fit in Walong siding.  ;)

ednadolski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4812
  • Respect: +1757
Re: Tehachapi Layout research help wanted
« Reply #72 on: December 23, 2009, 11:59:08 AM »
0
yet another train that won't fit in Walong siding.

Any truth to the rumors about UP planning to double-track portions of the Tehachapi line?

If they daylighted tunnels # 9 and 10 (sacrilege!) then they could double-track from Woodford to Marcel.   Not sure how much that would help tho.

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 10869
  • Respect: +2418
Re: Tehachapi Layout research help wanted
« Reply #73 on: December 23, 2009, 12:36:41 PM »
0
Meets at Walong have been a relative rarity for decades. At only 4800' it was barely usable even 30 years ago. DS usually saves meets for Woodford. I personally wouldn't be surprised if they yanked the siding out altogether in the shadow of any nearby daylighting or realignments.

The double-tracking talk has been around for a while, but I think it's a pipe dream (or nightmare, depending on your perspective). BNSF has been the biggest user of Tehachapi for several years. SP's... uhhhhhhh.... UP's north/south business has dropped considerably, and they're moving the lion's share of their West Coast traffic east via Donner or the Sunset line. Last I heard is it was a very remote possibility with BNSF footing most of the bill, but right now I think everybody's attention down there is on the billion-plus grade separation proposal for the crossing at Colton. Plus, UP has been throwing tons of money at upgrading Donner, so Feather River Canyon fans, beware.
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

GaryHinshaw

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6344
  • Respect: +1869
Re: Tehachapi Layout research help wanted
« Reply #74 on: December 23, 2009, 02:30:50 PM »
0
The last few times I've been to Tehachapi, the BNSF/UP ratio was about 4/1, at least during daylight hours.  Double-tracking the line would take away a lot of it's "charm" -- but I'm all for it if it means more trains!

By the way, doesn't the proposed high-speed line from SF-LA go over the pass?  How is that supposed to work?

I think the FRT traffic has already dropped off with the introduction of stacks to Donner last month.  Are there any plans to re-double-track the rest of Donner?  Emigrant Gap was my first railfan hangout as a teenager (SD-45's and PFE's galore) so I'll always have a soft spot for that line, especially the original track 1 over the Pass:

http://railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=282737&nseq=0
http://railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=149253&nseq=7

though I can't picture that stretch being re-opened...