0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I gotta say Kato (though they can do no wrong) keep missing a really obvious scheme for the mid-pro SD40-2. Ever heard of Illinois Central? If they keep beating that dead horse BNSF, they're gonna get pulp...Do a freakin' IC mid-pro SD40-2... and an SD75I already!
I gotta say Kato (though they can do no wrong) keep missing a really obvious scheme for the mid-pro SD40-2. Ever heard of Illinois Central? If they keep beating that dead horse BNSF, they're gonna get pulp...
...they are probably making the molds first for the non DB shell as well as the mold for the sill with pilot mounted ditch lights ! (one can only hope...)
DL, I think we'll NEVER see those, thanks to the Flexicoil trucks. That is, of course, if Kato cared about two things:1. Accuracy2. Railroads that aren't either BNSF or UP or one of their ancestors.
Are you sure Mark? Were those SD40-2s ex-Con numbers?It's still a little more believable though, since NS has some non-con 40-2s. ALL of CR's had the flexicoils.
http://www.rr-fallenflags.org/ns/ns1642k.jpgThey have the right trucks just missing a brake cylinder...
Ahh, we're talking brake cylinders here, not truck styles. The CR issue is Flexicoil vs. HTC.The brake cylinder is probably easier to fix, you can just add one. Or, if they wanted to do it right, could just mold new sideframes. They'd have to tool up entirely new truck fixtures to mount Flexicoils on their SD40-2 mechs.
Guys, you gotta remember that we're a backwater market for Kato. AFAIK, Japan is their bread-and-butter. Does that make them the "Atlas of Japan"?Gotta apply some of those modeling skills to get exactly what ya want