0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
If you guys have ever looked at old farm properties, you will recognize where the expression "over the hill" comes from. In the "old days" when people had more land, they had their own junk heaps for stuff that they could no longer repair. Those piles were put in places that were out of sight from the main house, where they did not have to mow around them. Sometimes it was literally just on the other side of a hill from the house, where it was not visible from an upstairs window. But, more often it seems to have been in the nearest ravine, where it was quickly covered with vines a and dead leaves.Anyway, our ancestors also seem to have thrown away a lot of dead appliances. But, today, appliances don't seem to last as long, are not as easy to repair, and there is nowhere left to just dump them at home. Often, a large conglomeration of metal and machinery is rendered useless by the failure of a small electronic chip that is unique to that appliance and no longer made. The "new" version that you need to buy comes with the version X+1 chip, and the version X chip cannot be replaced by that in the "old" model appliance.It seems obvious that a little forethought and standardization could avoid a lot of waste and lost investments by consumers. But, unless some manufacturer thinks that reliability and repairability are good selling features to use against the competition, we aren't going to get that choice. The profit motive seems to force planned unreliability for increase sales of "new" replacement products. The U.S. auto manufacturers took that to the point where they lost sales to Japanese manufacturers. Hoping that Kato can keep the rest of the model railroad industry from "going off the rails" in the same direction.
I have a local Maytag place who won’t service appliances not purchased by them. Which I get except for the fact I bought my refrigerator prior to moving. So I am much less likely to buy from him in the future. He advertises himself as a Maytag repair business, where you buy it from should be irrelevant. Now I know warranty claims are governed by where you purchase the item, or so I have been told.
Maybe he could offer two different repair rates - a lower rate if you bought the appliance from him, and a higher rate if you bought it elsewhere.That's still not quite fair to someone who is new to the area and brought their appliances with them, but at least it would give you an option for service.
I buy old parts for my washer and dryer, you can get them parts just about anywhere.
But, today, appliances don't seem to last as long, are not as easy to repair, and there is nowhere left to just dump them at home. Often, a large conglomeration of metal and machinery is rendered useless by the failure of a small electronic chip that is unique to that appliance and no longer made. The "new" version that you need to buy comes with the version X+1 chip, and the version X chip cannot be replaced by that in the "old" model appliance.It seems obvious that a little forethought and standardization could avoid a lot of waste and lost investments by consumers. But, unless some manufacturer thinks that reliability and repairability are good selling features to use against the competition, we aren't going to get that choice. The profit motive seems to force planned unreliability for increase sales of "new" replacement products. The U.S. auto manufacturers took that to the point where they lost sales to Japanese manufacturers. Hoping that Kato can keep the rest of the model railroad industry from "going off the rails" in the same direction.