Author Topic: RJ45 Ethernet cable as wiring  (Read 1517 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

RAILCAT

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 142
  • Respect: +7
RJ45 Ethernet cable as wiring
« on: October 18, 2016, 05:42:01 AM »
0
I have a large layout to construct next year for my pal in his under construction
railroad room with a house attached. :D

How suitable would using RJ45 Ethernet cable and connectors be for
connecting up the large layout between each board. DCC buss and 16v ac for point control.
I was think of using each twisted pair commoned up as a single wire giving me the 4 required wires.
With a breakout connector on each board to facilitate the connections. I would loop the cables back to create
a loop.

Will the cable have enough current carrying capacity?

Scottl

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4876
  • Respect: +1586
Re: RJ45 Ethernet cable as wiring
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2016, 07:03:48 AM »
0
It might be useful for some light loads like frogs, turnout motors and signalling, but for a large layout the voltage loss in such small gauge wire will be a problem.  Also, the current carrying capacity will be a limit too.

I use phone wire (6-conductor) for turnout and frog control to my Tortoise units.  There is an extra set of wires there for the contacts at the Tortoise (signalling or operation of the motor confirmation).

dckuk

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 32
  • Respect: +2
Re: RJ45 Ethernet cable as wiring
« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2016, 07:23:50 AM »
0
I would be concerned if you were to move/remove plugs while powered. Low amp LAN/WAN will n ot arc like even 5 amps on 12-18 VAC will.

Surely there is a cheaper option out there?

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 10903
  • Respect: +2425
Re: RJ45 Ethernet cable as wiring
« Reply #3 on: October 18, 2016, 09:31:49 AM »
0
I wouldn't. Like Scott said, not enough current carrying capacity and too much voltage drop under load.

Worst of all, do not loop a DCC bus! Over-simplified explanation: looping a line with a high-frequency signal on it causes the pulses to fight each other as they meet, and meet, and meet, and meet...
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

ednadolski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4816
  • Respect: +1760
Re: RJ45 Ethernet cable as wiring
« Reply #4 on: October 18, 2016, 10:40:23 AM »
0
Will the cable have enough current carrying capacity?

Depend on the specific gauge of the wire.  But you probably want to avoid the CCA (copper clad aluminum) stuff:

http://www.belden.com/blog/datacenters/Not-in-My-Network-Copper-Clad-Aluminum-is-a-Recipe-for-Failure.cfm
http://blog.showmecables.com/copper-clad-aluminum-vs-pure-copper-cables/


HTH,
Ed

mmyers

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1001
  • Respect: +50
Re: RJ45 Ethernet cable as wiring
« Reply #5 on: October 18, 2016, 08:38:38 PM »
0

Will the cable have enough current carrying capacity?

Short answer, No.

Martin Myers

RAILCAT

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 142
  • Respect: +7
Re: RJ45 Ethernet cable as wiring
« Reply #6 on: October 19, 2016, 04:29:20 AM »
0

OK, thanks for the input. Will go with a different cabling for the DCC.

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 33080
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +5401
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: RJ45 Ethernet cable as wiring
« Reply #7 on: October 19, 2016, 12:45:39 PM »
0
Robert Gilmore will probably chime in here with his recommendation for extra-pure virgin oxygen-free 12AWG copper wire (not that there is anything wrong with that).  :D

I however think it is a bit of an overkill.  A plain 14AWG or 12AWG (if your layout is really large with long wire runs and your trains draw lots of current) zip cord will be more than sufficient. Just Google 14AWG (or 12AWG) zip cord and you'll find plenty of sources.  I prefer the red-black zip cord to the all-black zip cord used for low voltage landscape lighting. The red/black wire insulation is thinner (easier to work with) and the colors make identification of the polarity easier.
. . . 42 . . .

John

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 13430
  • Respect: +3279
Re: RJ45 Ethernet cable as wiring
« Reply #8 on: October 19, 2016, 04:46:51 PM »
0
ethernet cable is good for block detectors, signals, and other accessory stuff ..

robert3985

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3146
  • Respect: +1521
Re: RJ45 Ethernet cable as wiring
« Reply #9 on: October 20, 2016, 12:05:09 AM »
0
Robert Gilmore will probably chime in here with his recommendation for extra-pure virgin oxygen-free 12AWG copper wire (not that there is anything wrong with that).  :D

I however think it is a bit of an overkill.  A plain 14AWG or 12AWG (if your layout is really large with long wire runs and your trains draw lots of current) zip cord will be more than sufficient. Just Google 14AWG (or 12AWG) zip cord and you'll find plenty of sources.  I prefer the red-black zip cord to the all-black zip cord used for low voltage landscape lighting. The red/black wire insulation is thinner (easier to work with) and the colors make identification of the polarity easier.

Thank you Peter.  If I were to do it again, I would use 14AWG extra-pure virgin low-ox copper speaker zip wire in red and black.  What I went with was identical speaker zip-wire but in 12AWG.  There is some good evidence that signal loss is much less in 14AWG wire than 12AWG due to the effective diameter of the fine multi-strand physical characteristics vs DCC signal type.  Don't ask me to 'splain it, but the evidence presented by an electrical engineer was pretty convincing.

As a bonus, 14AWG premium grade wire is cheaper than 12AWG.

All that said, on my present 36' X 20' portable layout, I have no evidence whatsoever of signal loss anywhere.

I found a helluva deal on 300 ft rolls of my wire on eBay, so I bought a couple of 'em.  Much less expensive than the crap I found at The Home Depot and Lowes, made for outdoor lighting that, when stripped, was pre-oxidized...badly so..like green.

I agree that the metal purity is probably "overkill", but price-wise, it wasn't.  I prefer "overkill" on complicated to install items like layout wiring anyway since it's just as easy (or easier) to install, and I can be confident that as my modular layout grows to its ultimate 30' X 50' size, I won't have to rip it out and replace it with better bus cable.

Peter is probably correct that the difference between "just" copper cable and "pure, lo-ox" copper cable is incremental.  However, the bigger the layout, the more any potential problems will occur.

Better safe than sorry..

Cheerio!
Bob Gilmore